← Search

Felipe Martinez

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lutz, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
190 matches · 103W–87L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history190 matches
L
2026-10-24 · Cheval Knights/Windgassen · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-09-26 · Cheval Knights/Windgassen · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leo Dorbad
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-12 · Cheval Knights/Windgassen · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Holger Berg
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-29 · HCC Unfinished Business/Pabon · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christopher Baker
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-25 · HCC Unfinished Business/Pabon · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kaden LeComte
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-08 · HCC Unfinished Business/Pabon · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kaden LeComte
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-01 · Cheval Tightly Strung/Abrams · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Holger Berg
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-25 · Cheval Tightly Strung/Abrams · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amer Aldeen
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-11 · HCC Unfinished Business/Pabon · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kaden LeComte
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-21 · HILLS/Martinez · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Price mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-20 · HILLS/Martinez · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Price mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-19 · HILLS/Martinez · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Natalie Martinez mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
59%
49W–34L · 53.5% of games
4.5
36.4%
8W–14L · 43.3% of games
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 48.1% of games
8.5
50%
7W–7L · 49.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 52.3% of games
8.0mixed
60.8%
31W–20L · 53.8% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 32.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
45 matches
#1 Singles
12%
22 matches
#2 Singles
6%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King