← Search

Jason Lichtman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lutz, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 62W–77L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history139 matches
W
2026-10-31 · Cheval Knights/Hayes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Abrams
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-10-25 · Cheval Knights/Abrams · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alfredo Guido
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-24 · Cheval Knights/Hayes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kenneth Sallings
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-19 · Cheval Knights/Hayes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kenneth Sallings
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-13 · Cheval Knights/Abrams · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sundar Srinivasan
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-29 · Cheval Over Served/Sparr · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Luke Gatza
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-08 · Cheval Over Served/Sparr · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sean O'Brien
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-01 · Cheval Over Served/Sparr · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kenneth Sallings
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · Cheval Over Served/Sparr · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sean O'Brien
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-27 · Cheval Over Served/Sparr · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sean O'Brien
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
Default
2026-06-13 · ChevalKnights/Cheval/ M. Hayes · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Busby
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-06 · ChevalKnights/Cheval/ M. Hayes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harish Manohar
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
48%
24W–26L · 51.9% of games
4.0
45.3%
24W–29L · 49% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
36.4%
8W–14L · 41.8% of games
8.5
20%
1W–4L · 31.8% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
33 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer