← Search

Andrew Busby

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lutz, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 28W–24L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history52 matches
L
2026-09-26 · Cheval Knights/Hayes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregory Perpetua
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-19 · Cheval Knights/Hayes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregory Perpetua
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-09-12 · Cheval Knights/Hayes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sundar Srinivasan
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-15 · Cheval Tightly Strung/Abrams · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Denny Windgassen
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-06-13 · ChevalKnights/Cheval/ M. Hayes · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Lichtman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-30 · ChevalKnights/Cheval/ M. Hayes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregory Perpetua
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · ChevalKnights/Cheval/ M. Hayes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harish Manohar
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · ChevalKnights/Cheval/ M. Hayes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Roig
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-02 · ChevalKnights/Cheval/ M. Hayes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Marsocci
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-18 · ChevalKnights/Cheval/ M. Hayes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregory Perpetua
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-07 · Cheval Knights - M. Hayes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Marsocci
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-02-21 · Cheval Knights - M. Hayes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brady Schmitt
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
52%
13W–12L · 54% of games
4.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 52.6% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.2% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
7 matches
#2 Singles
8%
4 matches
Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert