← Search

Jose Alomar

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Spring Hill, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
274 matches · 188W–86L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history274 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Arbor Greene 8.0x 55+/Paul · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rhonda Smiechewicz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-11-01 · Arbor Greene Bourbon Boys/Williams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sylvain Gauthier
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-25 · HCC/Schneider · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Schneider
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-10 · Arbor Greene Bourbon Boys/Williams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eugene Martineau
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-04 · HCC/Schneider · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Glenn Dimicco
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-10-03 · Arbor Greene Bourbon Boys/Williams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eugen Schwarz
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-09-27 · HCC/Schneider · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Schneider
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-26 · HCC/Schneider · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Schneider
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-26 · Arbor Greene Bourbon Boys/Williams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jakob Andersen
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-20 · Arbor Greene 8.0x 55+/Paul · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Caralyn Paul mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-19 · Arbor Greene Bourbon Boys/Williams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sylvain Gauthier
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-12 · Arbor Greene Bourbon Boys/Williams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Kandell
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
69.9%
109W–47L · 56.8% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
82.4%
42W–9L · 66.4% of games
8.0
62.1%
18W–11L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.4% of games
8.0mixed
55.2%
16W–13L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
122 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
96 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
51 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams