← Search

Eugene Martineau

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tampa, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
136 matches · 73W–63L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history136 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Arbor Greene Bourbon Boys/Williams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Kandell
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
Default
2026-10-18 · River Hills/Wu · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chris Canfield
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-10 · Arbor Greene Bourbon Boys/Williams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jose Alomar
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-26 · Arbor Greene Bourbon Boys/Williams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Arfsten
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-30 · Arbor Green BourbonBoys/ P. Williams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Kandell
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-16 · Arbor Green BourbonBoys/ P. Williams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Williams
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · Arbor Green BourbonBoys/ P. Williams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Deters
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-29 · Arbor Green BourbonBoys/ P. Williams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Bell
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-11 · Arbor Green BourbonBoys/ P. Williams · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Kandell
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · Arbor Green Bourbon Boys - P. Williams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Kandell
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-02-19 · Arbor Green Bourbon Boys - P. Williams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jakob Andersen
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-01-17 · Arbor Green Bourbon Boys - P. Williams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Gauthier
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
53%
62W–55L · 51.7% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
75%
9W–3L · 63.4% of games
8.5
20%
1W–4L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
38 matches
#1 Singles
7%
10 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal