← Search

Paul Williams

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tampa, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
218 matches · 136W–82L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history218 matches
L
2026-06-13 · Arbor Green BourbonBoys/ P. Williams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sundar Ekambaram
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · Arbor Green BourbonBoys/ P. Williams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sylvain Gauthier
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-05-16 · Arbor Green BourbonBoys/ P. Williams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eugene Martineau
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-29 · Arbor Green BourbonBoys/ P. Williams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jakob Andersen
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-11 · Arbor Green BourbonBoys/ P. Williams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jakob Andersen
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-03-07 · Arbor Green Bourbon Boys - P. Williams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jakob Andersen
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-02-28 · Arbor Green Bourbon Boys - P. Williams · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-02-07 · Arbor Green Bourbon Boys - P. Williams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sundar Ekambaram
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-01-24 · Arbor Green Bourbon Boys - P. Williams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jakob Andersen
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-01-17 · Arbor Green Bourbon Boys - P. Williams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jakob Andersen
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-10 · Arbor Green Bourbon Boys - P. Williams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jakob Andersen
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-10-08 · AG Bourbon Boys - P. Williams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jakob Andersen
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
60.1%
104W–69L · 54.8% of games
7.5
50%
3W–3L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
74.4%
29W–10L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
52 matches
#1 Singles
7%
16 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams