Teams

Benson White: DMG

2023 IA 18 & Over Adult League · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-01vs Wilker & Everett: LifetimeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJaime Morgan / Heather Brown vs Lisa Noe / Michelle Moorehead6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Ariano vs Linda Wilker4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-02-24vs Jordan & Blume: GenesisLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarit Florke / Jaime Morgan vs Tera Jordan / Karin Beschen3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMary Melvin vs Emilie Pohlman2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAndria Klinefeldt / Heather Brown vs Audra Bonner / Kate Reis6-2, 6-4
2023-02-04vs Benson Blue: DMGLost 02
L#1 DoublesHeather Brown / Farnaz Maters vs Eileen Wixted / Shannon Bischoff3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarit Florke / Andria Klinefeldt vs Brittney Carpenter / Sabina Kneifl0-6, 1-6
2023-01-21vs Wilker & Everett: LifetimeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFarnaz Maters / Heather Brown vs Teri Everett / Jill King0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJaime Morgan vs Lisa Noe6-3, 6-3
2022-12-17vs Jordan & Blume: GenesisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Melvin / Elizabeth Ariano vs Audra Bonner / Tera Jordan6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJaime Morgan vs Emilie Pohlman2-6, 1-6
2022-12-03vs Benson Blue: DMGLost 03
L#1 DoublesFarnaz Maters / Jaime Morgan vs Patricia Hoffmann / Kristin Rose2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Ariano vs Shannon Bischoff1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarit Florke / Heather Brown vs Anna DeWaay / Sabina Kneifl1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jordan & Blume: Genesis4210817136
2Wilker & Everett: Lifetime4210818135
3Benson Blue: DMG249918150
4Benson White: DMG2471123162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.58
Jaime Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.40
Andria Klinefeldt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.23
Farnaz Maters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.91
Marit Florke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Elizabeth Ariano
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Heather Brown
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Jeff Benson
published
Mary Melvin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jaime Morgan
13W–20L career · 5 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Andria Klinefeldt
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.40
Farnaz Maters
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.23
Marit Florke
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Elizabeth Ariano
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Heather Brown
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeff Benson
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Melvin
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.