Teams

Wilker & Everett: Lifetime

2023 IA 18 & Over Adult League · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-01vs Benson White: DMGSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Noe / Michelle Moorehead vs Jaime Morgan / Heather Brown7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLinda Wilker vs Elizabeth Ariano6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-03vs Benson Blue: DMGSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiane Cortese / Michelle Moorehead vs Anna DeWaay / Brittney Carpenter1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJill King vs Eileen Wixted6-0, 6-2
2023-02-04vs Jordan & Blume: GenesisLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Champion / Laura Vallier vs Tera Jordan / Karin Beschen3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-01-21vs Benson White: DMGWon 10
W#1 DoublesTeri Everett / Jill King vs Farnaz Maters / Heather Brown6-0, 6-0
2022-12-10vs Benson Blue: DMGWon 20
W#1 DoublesTeri Everett / Lori Hanson vs Anna DeWaay / Kristin Rose6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDiane Cortese / Jill King vs Patricia Hoffmann / Eileen Wixted6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-12-02vs Jordan & Blume: GenesisLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeri Everett / Usicha Marchant vs Ashleysha Pujari / Karin Beschen2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLinda Wilker vs Emilie Pohlman1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Champion / Lori Hanson vs Lisa Schmitz / Kathryn Byrnes7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jordan & Blume: Genesis4210817136
2Wilker & Everett: Lifetime4210818135
3Benson Blue: DMG249918150
4Benson White: DMG2471123162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.65
Michelle Moorehead
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.64
Linda Wilker
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.58
Teri Everett
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.46
Michelle Champion
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Diana Kautzky
published 2.5
Diane Cortese
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Jill King
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Champion + Linda Wilker2638% games−8.6% vs expected
Teri Everett + Michelle Champion134 matchesnot enough data
Teri Everett + Linda Wilker224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Moorehead
14W–7L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%15%85%
2.65
Linda Wilker
23W–45L career · 6 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
2.64
Teri Everett
15W–34L career · 5 lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
2.58
Michelle Champion
9W–26L career · 7 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.46
2.5
Diana Kautzky
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Diane Cortese
6W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill King
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.