Teams

Christina Britt

2025 Springfield Adult 18 & Over Winter Leagues · 4.0 Winter Adult Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-05vs Hee Sun KimWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison Anbari / Christina Britt vs Mona Palmer / Tami Murphy6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCarolee Jones vs Patricia Musick1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Hayes / Kortney Wassam vs Christina Waugh / Carolyn Hanger6-3, 6-1
2025-02-27vs Hee Sun KimWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristina Britt / Kortney Wassam vs Hee-Sun Kim / Cheryl Ballou4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarolee Jones vs Carolyn Hanger6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Hayes / Leslie Echols vs Mona Palmer / Christina Waugh7-6, 6-4
2025-02-19vs Hee Sun KimLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Wachob / Kelly Hayes vs Mona Palmer / Tami Murphy6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLeslie Echols vs Patricia Musick1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAllison Anbari vs Hee-Sun Kim1-6, 0-6
2025-02-12vs Hee Sun KimWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Hayes / Leslie Echols vs Cheryl Ballou / Tami Murphy6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCarolee Jones vs Hee-Sun Kim6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAllison Anbari / Stephanie Wachob vs Christina Waugh / Carolyn Hanger6-4, 6-2
2025-02-05vs Hee Sun KimWon 30
W#1 DoublesAllison Anbari / Stephanie Wachob vs Kathy Crouthers / Patricia Musick6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarolee Jones vs Hee-Sun Kim6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristina Britt / Kortney Wassam vs Mona Palmer / Cheryl Ballou3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Winter Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Carolee Jones
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.78
Allison Anbari
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.49
Leslie Echols
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Kortney Wassam
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Christina Britt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.32
Stephanie Wachob
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Britt + Kortney Wassam213 matchesnot enough data
Allison Anbari + Stephanie Wachob213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolee Jones
45W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.85
4
Allison Anbari
16W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.78
Leslie Echols
98W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
Kortney Wassam
41W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
4
Christina Britt
17W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.34
Stephanie Wachob
55W–57L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.