Teams

Cummer/18/W/3-3.5-4/QTC

2023 Shrev-Boss Tri-Level 18 & Over - Women Night · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Shrev

21 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Meg Frazier
published
3.58
Carol Matthews
published 4
3.46
Meredith Gore
published
3.37
Karen Pharr
published
3.19
Ashlin Harper
published 3.5
3.16
Nicole Mazur
published
3.14
Laquita Briggs
published
3.13
Julie Spano
published
3.12
Elise McMahen
published 3.5
2.98
MLiss Sella
published
2.92
Heather Duke
published 3
2.80
Marlene Fontenot
published
2.76
Madeline Cummer
published
2.68
Amy Knotts
published 3
2.66
Frances Pitman
published 3
2.56
Michele Hardtner
published
Kerry Friestad
published
Leigh Anne Evensky
published
Marcia Alcantara
published
Mindi Wolf
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MLiss Sella + Elise McMahen8751% games+7.2% vs expected
Nicole Mazur + Meredith Gore5354% games+2.3% vs expected
Madeline Cummer + MLiss Sella5648% games−3.8% vs expected
Madeline Cummer + Frances Pitman224 matchesnot enough data
Frances Pitman + MLiss Sella314 matchesnot enough data
Madeline Cummer + Laquita Briggs123 matchesnot enough data
Amy Knotts + Frances Pitman123 matchesnot enough data
Kerry Friestad + Laquita Briggs213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meg Frazier
64W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Carol Matthews
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.58
Meredith Gore
43W–42L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Karen Pharr
5W–19L career · no lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
3.37
3.5
Ashlin Harper
15W–22L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Nicole Mazur
17W–17L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
Laquita Briggs
22W–29L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
Julie Spano
19W–38L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Elise McMahen
23W–25L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
MLiss Sella
81W–64L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Heather Duke
24W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.92
Marlene Fontenot
24W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
Madeline Cummer
56W–48L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Amy Knotts
26W–43L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Frances Pitman
17W–21L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
2.66
Michele Hardtner
4W–19L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.56
Kerry Friestad
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leigh Anne Evensky
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marcia Alcantara
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Kathryne Bowman
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mindi Wolf
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.