Teams

NJ GREEN

2024 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO

11 players · average NTRP 3.58 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-13vs BRMST TEALLost 02
L#1 DoublesWendy Doran / Shannon Vigil vs Lynn Knickerbocker / Carol Anderson3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlyssa Cormack / Kathy Hardin vs Cynthia Manley / Carrie Korth2-6, 5-7
2024-04-30vs NJ REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristen Clauss / Margaret Dowling vs Rachel Price / Rebecca Strobel2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrittany Laux vs Erin Manzolillo7-6, 7-5
2024-04-13vs LTA-Q YELLOWWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrittany Laux / Kristen Clauss vs Alisa Mallinger / Amanda Kapolnek6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-30vs BTA-E NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesMargaret Dowling / Aimee Petri vs Susi Gardner / Kathy Webber6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAlyssa Cormack vs Alex Richardson1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Hardin / Shannon Vigil vs Nina Rodd / Alia Ghandour6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Kristen Clauss
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Alyssa Cormack
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Aimee Petri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Amanda Wintenburg
published 3.5
3.21
Brittany Laux
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Shannon Vigil
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Joy Hicks
published
3.16
3.14
Kathy Hardin
published
3.13
Margaret Dowling
published
Wendy Doran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aimee Petri + Mary Virginia Simpson3443% games−7.7% vs expected
Wendy Doran + Shannon Vigil044 matchesnot enough data
Aimee Petri + Brittany Laux213 matchesnot enough data
Aimee Petri + Shannon Vigil213 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Dowling + Kristen Clauss123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Virginia Simpson + Shannon Vigil123 matchesnot enough data
Alyssa Cormack + Kristen Clauss303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristen Clauss
63W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
3.5
Alyssa Cormack
28W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Aimee Petri
136W–73L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Amanda Wintenburg
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Brittany Laux
42W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Shannon Vigil
12W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Joy Hicks
7W–18L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Mary Virginia Simpson
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Kathy Hardin
9W–15L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
Margaret Dowling
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Wendy Doran
0W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.