Teams

NJ RED

2024 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-30vs NJ GREENLost 02
L#1 SinglesErin Manzolillo vs Brittany Laux6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLeah Vladika / Christy Carello vs Mary Virginia Simpson / Wendy Doran5-7, 3-6
2024-04-27vs LTA-Q YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPam Long / Jennifer Grube vs Linda Vigil / Sara Campbell6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLeah Vladika / Erin Manzolillo vs Lori Preston / Camille Benton3-6, 5-7
2024-04-17vs BRMST TEALWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Manzolillo / Rachel Price vs Jill Bouck / Carrie Korth6-3, 7-6
2024-04-13vs BTA-E NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerri Jenney / Jennifer Grube vs Nina Rodd / Susi Gardner3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesErin Manzolillo vs Alex Richardson2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLeah Vladika / Natalie Cervera vs Alia Ghandour / Kathy Webber6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Becky Bell
published 4
3.30
Leah Vladika
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Rebecca Strobel
published
Christy Carello
published 3.5
3.21
Erin Manzolillo
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Jennifer Grube
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.82
Terri Jenney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Natalie Cervera
published
Pam Long
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky Bell + Terri Jenney5256% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Grube + Leah Vladika134 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Cervera + Christy Carello033 matchesnot enough data
Leah Vladika + Terri Jenney303 matchesnot enough data
Erin Manzolillo + Terri Jenney213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Becky Bell
16W–15L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Leah Vladika
85W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Rebecca Strobel
35W–31L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Christy Carello
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Erin Manzolillo
120W–68L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Jennifer Grube
49W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3
Terri Jenney
110W–65L career · 1 line in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Natalie Cervera
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Pam Long
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.