Teams

IE-CL-Andrea Bohn

2022 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-10vs IE-MVHS-Elvira SchlangerWon 10
W#2 DoublesErin Furlong / Jennifer Denson vs Sue Pruitt / Sofie Carpenter4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-12-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesSaleshnie Sukhram / Andrea Bohn vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-11-06vs IE-LLW-MTC-Jeanne ShelterLost 12
L#1 DoublesRhianna Thompson / Monica Johnson vs Rebecca Cloyd / Kim Wellman1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Bohn / Saleshnie Sukhram vs Heather Toth / Mary Ann Neder1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSandy Wible / Wendy Williams vs Maureen Duncan / Joan Greene5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesErin Furlong / Saleshnie Sukhram vs Kathie Clay / Melissa Connor6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSandy Wible / Wendy Williams vs Karin Pace / Kimberly Geske6-1, 6-3
2022-10-16vs IE-APTC-CleoWon 30
W#1 DoublesRhianna Thompson / Monica Johnson vs Jill Stephens / Karen Ewing6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndrea Bohn / Erin Furlong vs Jane Magro / Ethel Manley2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSandy Wible / Wendy Williams vs Michelle He / Ilse Ungeheuer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-08vs IE-VMHS-Joanne HarnedWon 20
W#1 DoublesRhianna Thompson / Saleshnie Sukhram vs Karin Ward / Briana Masters1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSandy Wible / Wendy Williams vs Tessie Rivera / Teryl Deigan6-2, 7-5
2022-09-24vs IE-TCC-Ellen YarterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrea Bohn / Saleshnie Sukhram vs Laurel Eriksen / Ellen Yarter7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesErin Furlong / Sheila Walkington vs Shaheen Plunier / Jill Mastroluca3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Rhianna Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Saleshnie Sukhram
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
3.31
Erin Furlong
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.21
Sandy Wible
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.69
Tina Maslach
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Furlong + Sandy Wible3256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rhianna Thompson
137W–91L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Saleshnie Sukhram
114W–80L career · 13 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Erin Furlong
49W–48L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Sandy Wible
58W–67L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3
Elizabeth Cardoza
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69
Tina Maslach
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.