Teams

IE-TCC-Ellen Yarter

2022 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-17Won 30
W#1 DoublesEllen Yarter / Laurel Eriksen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Kronseder / Jill Mastroluca vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKerri Munson / Anne Neal vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-11-05vs IE-APTC-CleoLost 02
L#2 DoublesJill Mastroluca / Kerri Munson vs Nova Gray / Jane Magro3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMarie Honda / Anne Neal vs Michelle He / Jill Stephens3-6, 1-6
2022-10-30vs IE-LLW-MTC-Jeanne ShelterLost 02
L#1 DoublesMara Watkins / Charlotte Pereira Reisch vs Jeanne Shelter / Heather Toth6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJill Mastroluca / Marie Honda vs Rebecca Cloyd / Kim Wellman2-6, 1-6
2022-10-09vs IE-CL-Michelle Porter/Melissa ConnerSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKerri Munson / Jill Mastroluca vs Nancy Contreras / Rhonda Arendt7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarie Honda / Linda Kronseder vs Tammy Kennedy / Suzy Weisman0-6, 2-6
2022-10-01vs IE-VMHS-Joanne HarnedWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristina Ciambriello / Linda Kronseder vs Sheila Forgerson / April Mays6-4, 6-3
2022-09-24vs IE-CL-Andrea BohnWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaurel Eriksen / Ellen Yarter vs Andrea Bohn / Saleshnie Sukhram6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesShaheen Plunier / Jill Mastroluca vs Erin Furlong / Sheila Walkington6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMarie Honda / Anne Neal vs Elizabeth Cardoza / Tina Maslach6-0, 6-1
2022-09-17vs IE-CCCC-Sesilie Kay/Amy TaylorWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaurel Eriksen / Ellen Yarter vs Danika Egizi / Dana Olague7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShaheen Plunier / Jill Mastroluca vs Kelly Barhorst / Cristina Hamlin4-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMarie Honda / Linda Kronseder vs Amy Garrett / Sesilie Kay6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Silvia Vich
published
3.33
Anne Neal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Ellen Yarter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Shaheen Plunier
published
3.18
Charlotte Pereira Reisch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Kerri Munson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Marie Honda
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.05
Linda Kronseder
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Jill Mastroluca
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Laurel Eriksen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerri Munson + Charlotte Pereira Reisch6550% games+9.5% vs expected
Anne Neal + Charlotte Pereira Reisch5453% games+4.1% vs expected
Kerri Munson + Jill Mastroluca466546% games−3.0% vs expected
Linda Kronseder + Marie Honda6841% gamesnot enough data
Linda Kronseder + Anne Neal8647% gamesnot enough data
Anne Neal + Kerri Munson6550% gamesnot enough data
Kerri Munson + Ellen Yarter6454% gamesnot enough data
Linda Kronseder + Kerri Munson5449% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Silvia Vich
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
3.5
Anne Neal
72W–71L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Ellen Yarter
82W–127L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Shaheen Plunier
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Charlotte Pereira Reisch
95W–94L career · 1 line in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Kerri Munson
129W–137L career · 3 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Marie Honda
48W–76L career · 5 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Linda Kronseder
50W–96L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Jill Mastroluca
87W–121L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
Laurel Eriksen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.