Teams

IE-CCCC-Sesilie Kay/Amy Taylor

2022 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-04vs IE-CL-Andrea BohnLost 02
L#1 DoublesSesilie Kay / Amy Taylor vs Elizabeth Cardoza / Jennifer Denson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnnette Flores / Stephanie Ells vs Sheila Walkington / Leslie Martin6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2022-11-13vs IE-MVHS-Elvira SchlangerWon 20
W#2 DoublesAshley Driscoll / Sesilie Kay vs Michele Lawrence / Patricia Quinn6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeidi Brun / Stephanie Ells vs Elvira Schlanger / Kristin Clelland5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-11-05vs IE-CL-Michelle Porter/Melissa ConnerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSesilie Kay / Amy Garrett vs Michelle Porter / Melissa Connor7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeidi Brun / Stephanie Ells vs Kathie Clay / Julie Sell6-0, 6-1
2022-10-29vs IE-VMHS-Joanne HarnedWon 10
W#3 DoublesHeidi Brun / Stephanie Ells vs Tessie Rivera / Sheila Forgerson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-23vs IE-APTC-CleoWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Garrett / Sesilie Kay vs Brianne King / Ethel Manley3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Ells / Annette Flores vs Jennifer Daniels / Jill Schoner6-2, 6-2
2022-10-16vs IE-LLW-MTC-Jeanne ShelterWon 10
W#3 DoublesSesilie Kay / Heidi Brun vs Elizabeth Bentley / Lori Covach6-4, 6-4
2022-09-17vs IE-TCC-Ellen YarterWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Garrett / Sesilie Kay vs Marie Honda / Linda Kronseder2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Cristina Hamlin
published 4
3.30
Stephanie Ells
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Heidi Brun
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.73
Annette Flores
published 3
2.73
Sesilie Kay
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Kathy Reeves
published
Shelley Mellentine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sesilie Kay + Heidi Brun6350% games+0.9% vs expected
Stephanie Ells + Heidi Brun404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cristina Hamlin
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
3.5
Stephanie Ells
75W–51L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Heidi Brun
139W–89L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Annette Flores
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Sesilie Kay
134W–145L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Kathy Reeves
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shelley Mellentine
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.