Teams

River Hills - J. O'Leary

2022 Hillsborough Tri-Level · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.58 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesGrace DiBenedetto / Tara Titus vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDena Linthicum / Meredith Vasey vs Christine Dietrich / SHERI ELLIS7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2022-07-27vs Sun City - L. GreenleeLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarianne DiMaio / Grace DiBenedetto vs Melody O'Sullivan / Edna Carlin4-6, 2-6
2022-07-06vs Harbour Island - D. McKnightWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmanda Deck / Dena Linthicum vs Dawn McKnight / Stephanie Narvades1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-29vs Fishhawk Fireballs - M. EiermannLost 01
L#2 DoublesGrace DiBenedetto / Tara Titus vs Tabetha Vandeboe / Krissy Heybroek3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Angela Piche
published 4
3.36
Anne Wooley
published 3.5
3.36
Teresa Manganello
published
3.26
Meredith Vasey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Dena Linthicum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Tara Titus
published
3.17
Brigitte Paola
published 3.5
3.12
Melanie Skinner
published
3.04
Grace DiBenedetto
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.84
Jen O'Leary
published
2.82
Susan MOSHER
published
Wendy Liller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Vasey + Dena Linthicum332353% games+2.6% vs expected
Grace DiBenedetto + Dena Linthicum224 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Manganello + Tara Titus123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Piche
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
3.5
Anne Wooley
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
Teresa Manganello
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Meredith Vasey
75W–44L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Dena Linthicum
78W–106L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Tara Titus
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Brigitte Paola
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Melanie Skinner
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.12
3.5
Grace DiBenedetto
21W–58L career · 6 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
Jen O'Leary
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
Susan MOSHER
16W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Wendy Liller
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.