Teams

Harbour Island - D. McKnight

2022 Hillsborough Tri-Level · 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-10vs Sun City - L. GreenleeLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Price / Julia van Diver vs Melody O'Sullivan / Lee Greenlee5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmira Helal / Stephanie Narvades vs Helene Kennedy-Peterson / Melody Smith4-6, 0-6
2022-08-03vs Arbor Greene Tri LOVAS - C. PaulLost 01
L#2 DoublesDawn McKnight / Melissa Wolfe vs Beth Hart / Caralyn Paul1-6, 4-6
2022-07-13vs Fishhawk Fireballs - M. EiermannLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Narvades / Jacquelyn Holland vs Deb Spears / Stephane Duroseau0-6, 2-6
2022-07-06vs River Hills - J. O'LearyLost 01
L#2 DoublesDawn McKnight / Stephanie Narvades vs Amanda Deck / Dena Linthicum6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2022-06-29vs Hills/FlinterLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelissa Wolfe / Dawn McKnight vs Laura Salzer / Luz Maria von Greiff4-6, 4-6
2022-06-22vs Avila Trifectas - G. MorganWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulia van Diver / Kristen Wehrman vs Trish Brynjolfsson / Elizabeth Snyder6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJacquelyn Holland / Stephanie Narvades vs Lisa Polk / Suzanne Peterson6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDawn McKnight / Melissa Wolfe vs Mary Ann Dellegatto / Shalle VanHorn6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Kristen Wehrman
published 4
4.00
Janet Karpan
published
3.56
Julia van Diver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Vera Dikmen
published
3.32
Dawn McKnight
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Stephanie Narvades
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
2.91
Kelly Wroten
published
Melissa Wolfe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn McKnight + Vera Dikmen224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristen Wehrman
64W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%13%87%
4.15
Janet Karpan
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
4.00
Julia van Diver
100W–97L career · 2 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
Vera Dikmen
13W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Dawn McKnight
97W–89L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Stephanie Narvades
16W–46L career · 9 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Kelly Wroten
15W–12L career · no lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
2.91
Melissa Wolfe
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.