Teams

KF.Ellis

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 5.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-02vs MCP.YamadaLost 03
L#1 DoublesRebecca King / Sandra Yancey vs Virginia Grau / Rumiko Ho3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Raasch / Dyvonne Ellis vs Aki Komi / Bonnie Mulder7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Munley / Eileen O Riordan vs Jennifer McGovern / Asuka Yamada0-6, 3-6
2026-08-26vs LOCH.CockayneLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Jabusch / Michele Chambers vs Lisa Swank / Kimberly Shames0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMary Munley / Dyvonne Ellis vs Pam Letts / Susan Hoffman5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Yancey / Eileen O Riordan vs Andrea Finucane / Susan Wisdom0-6, 1-6
2026-08-19vs ACP.OgrenLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn Stoddard / Rebecca King vs Leslie-Anne Ball / Ruth Smith1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDyvonne Ellis / Melissa Raasch vs Ann Mullins / Lauren Doyle3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMary Munley / Sandra Yancey vs Sarah Lewis / Lori Jee3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Combo 40 & Over 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCP.Yamada000000
2ANP.Fehervari0112534
3PW.Roussin0103633
4KF.Ellis0103636
5MD.Moncrief02151063

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Melissa Raasch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Stephanie Jabusch
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.58
Mary Munley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.25
Dyvonne Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.05
Eileen O Riordan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.95
Ann Stoddard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.86
Michele Chambers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Yancey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Melissa Raasch
60W–106L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
Stephanie Jabusch
25W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Mary Munley
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58
2.5
Dyvonne Ellis
31W–88L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Eileen O Riordan
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
2.5
Ann Stoddard
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Michele Chambers
1W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Sandra Yancey
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.