Teams

LA - Summer Strikers

2025 USTA MxD 40 & Over - LA · LA - 6.0 Mixed Doubles

33 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-23vs LA - MountainGateWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlison Cole-kelly / AJ Dickerson vs Michelle Horvitz / David Horvitz1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSharath Cherian / Robin Rosen vs Jeff Biederman / Denise Harris6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMelissa Karz / Tom Rubinson vs TERRENCE CHERMAK / Lisa Ruben6-0, 6-3
2025-07-19vs LA - Mulholland DriversLost 12
L#1 DoublesGloria Chang / Marc Gilbar vs Andi Schoffman / Michael Schoffman4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRonnie Roy / Elena Howell vs Wendy Magdlen / Robert Magdlen6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLiz Rosman / Fred Jasper vs Anisha Pattanaik / Geoff Stevens6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - 6.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 28 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Adam Cole-kelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Jesse Dang
published
3.27
Kevin Hann
published
3.24
Jesse Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
AJ Dickerson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Fred Jasper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Tom Rubinson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Karen Chou
published
3.00
Esther Nordlinger
published
2.96
Elena Howell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Oliver Nordlinger
published
2.93
Gloria Chang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Eleanor DeMartino
published
2.82
William Callahan
published
Benjamin Au
published 3
2.74
Robin Rosen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Ronnie Roy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Jake White
published
2.66
Diane Wagner
published 3
2.66
Nicki Jaeger
published
2.62
Renee Mochkatel
published
2.62
Sharath Cherian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Scott Zolendziewski
published
2.46
Melissa Karz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Liz Rosman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Alison Cole-kelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.33
Portia Furst
published
2.26
2.09
Gloria Hann
published
Greg Mandel
published
Jason Lakis
published
Keleigh Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marc Gilbar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elena Howell + Esther Nordlinger4259% games+12.4% vs expected
Eleanor DeMartino + Elena Howell2439% games−10.7% vs expected
Raquelle de la Rocha + Portia Furst123 matchesnot enough data
Jesse Dang + Jesse Young213 matchesnot enough data
AJ Dickerson + Ronnie Roy033 matchesnot enough data
Greg Mandel + Ronnie Roy123 matchesnot enough data
Ronnie Roy + William Callahan213 matchesnot enough data
Gloria Chang + Esther Nordlinger213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Cole-kelly
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Jesse Dang
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Kevin Hann
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Jesse Young
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
AJ Dickerson
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Fred Jasper
19W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Tom Rubinson
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Karen Chou
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Esther Nordlinger
23W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Elena Howell
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%38%
2.96
Oliver Nordlinger
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Gloria Chang
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Eleanor DeMartino
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
William Callahan
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Benjamin Au
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robin Rosen
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Ronnie Roy
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Jake White
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Diane Wagner
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Nicki Jaeger
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Renee Mochkatel
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Sharath Cherian
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Scott Zolendziewski
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Melissa Karz
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
Liz Rosman
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%67%33%
2.44
3
Alison Cole-kelly
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.43
Portia Furst
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
Raquelle de la Rocha
16W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.26
Gloria Hann
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Greg Mandel
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason Lakis
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Keleigh Morgan
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Marc Gilbar
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.