Teams

LA - Mulholland Drivers

2025 USTA MxD 40 & Over - LA · LA - 6.0 Mixed Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-26vs LA - Double TroubleWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeAnn Aharonian / Raffi Aharonian vs Rashidah Shakir / Richard Taylor6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWendy Magdlen / Robert Magdlen vs LOLA HERRON / Joseph Harris6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAnisha Pattanaik / Josh Millet vs Alexsis Glenn / Craig Roberts6-3, 7-6
2025-07-19vs LA - Summer StrikersWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndi Schoffman / Michael Schoffman vs Gloria Chang / Marc Gilbar6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWendy Magdlen / Robert Magdlen vs Ronnie Roy / Elena Howell2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAnisha Pattanaik / Geoff Stevens vs Liz Rosman / Fred Jasper6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - 6.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Anisha Pattanaik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Robert Magdlen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Michael Schoffman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Andi Schoffman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.19
LeAnn Aharonian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.18
Chi Kephart
published 2.5
Evelyn Taft
published
Geoff Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Josh Millet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Raffi Aharonian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ross Resnick
published
Wendy Magdlen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chi Kephart + LeAnn Aharonian2349% games+2.1% vs expected
LeAnn Aharonian + Raffi Aharonian123 matchesnot enough data
Andi Schoffman + Michael Schoffman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anisha Pattanaik
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Robert Magdlen
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Michael Schoffman
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.12
3
Andi Schoffman
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
LeAnn Aharonian
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Chi Kephart
12W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Evelyn Taft
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Geoff Stevens
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Josh Millet
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Raffi Aharonian
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ross Resnick
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Magdlen
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.