Teams

Corey Reich Tennis Center 55AM9.0A

2024 ADULT 55&Over · Men 9.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#3 DoublesBrian Heimbecker / Martin Manqueros vs Mark Chase / Paul Lizama6-3, 6-0
W#1 DoublesBrian Heimbecker / Glenn Teixeira vs Sanjay Backliwal / Mike Welden6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrian Heimbecker / Rick Kepler vs Cameron Larner / Peter Palmer6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.82
Curtis Dunn
published 5
4.44
Roshan Vasudev
published
4.33
Doug Ditmer
published
4.29
Brian Heimbecker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.27
David Richmond
published 4.5
4.24
Brian Barlay
published 4.5
4.23
Roman Olmos
published
4.16
Jeff MacHle
published
4.10
Glenn Teixeira
published
4.09
Michael Nathe
published
4.07
4.04
Martin Manqueros
published
4.04
Parris Krygsman
published
3.86
Michael Rennels
published
3.67
Samuel Pleasure
published
3.53
Kumar Kandaswamy
published
Ole Hoefelmann
published
Rick Kepler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Rennels + Samuel Pleasure213 matchesnot enough data
Jeff MacHle + David Richmond213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Curtis Dunn
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.82
Roshan Vasudev
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
4.44
Doug Ditmer
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
4.33
5
Brian Heimbecker
367W–83L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.29
4.5
David Richmond
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Brian Barlay
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.24
Roman Olmos
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Jeff MacHle
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
4.16
Glenn Teixeira
33W–16L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
4.10
Michael Nathe
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.09
Stephen Wullschleger
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.07
Martin Manqueros
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
38%61%<1%
4.04
Parris Krygsman
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
4.04
Michael Rennels
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.86
Samuel Pleasure
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Kumar Kandaswamy
17W–18L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.53
Ole Hoefelmann
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rick Kepler
18W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.