Teams

Samuell Grand/Roos-Oliver W4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W4.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesTricia Roos / Laura Reynolds vs Jyoti Kana / Artemis Boulamatsi6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesTricia Roos / Erin Lange vs Kelley Stark / Christina Lafferty0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLeigh Breunig vs Anya Preece6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLouise Bexley / Laura Reynolds vs Tari Kinsey / SHELLEY ARKELL6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLeah Oliver / Jennifer Hull vs Katie Kirk / Dana Johnson3-6, 4-6
2025-01-31vs T bar M/LeRosen-Myhre  W4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesErin Lange / Heather Neilson vs Erin Hendricks / Christine Nevitt6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMeg Lohr / Devon Bowling vs Kiki Simpson / Laurie Dunkin6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrenda Talavera / Leigh Breunig vs Erin McKool / Laura Koonsman6-1, 6-4
2025-01-24vs High Point/Jenkins-Davis W4.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesTricia Roos / Devon Bowling vs Hope Heldmar / Jennifer Young6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMeg Lohr / Louise Bexley vs Julie Piatas / Kelly Wyant7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMaria Hasbany / Rochelle Watson vs Staci Frost / Kerry Kavanaugh6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Meg Lohr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Laura Reynolds
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.90
Shannon Hogan
published
3.86
Erin Lange
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Rochelle Watson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.78
Maria Hasbany
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Kasey Colvin
published
3.75
Louise Bexley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Tricia Roos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Devon Bowling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Leah Oliver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Leigh Breunig
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.51
Sunita Wardley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Brenda Talavera
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.45
Karen Saland
published
3.30
Tina Kimbell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Heather Neilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia Roos + Louise Bexley7557% games+2.1% vs expected
Erin Lange + Tricia Roos5253% games+1.0% vs expected
Rochelle Watson + Sunita Wardley314 matchesnot enough data
Maria Hasbany + Leah Oliver303 matchesnot enough data
Meg Lohr + Tricia Roos303 matchesnot enough data
Meg Lohr + Louise Bexley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meg Lohr
35W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.01
Laura Reynolds
19W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
4.00
Shannon Hogan
16W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
Erin Lange
47W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
Rochelle Watson
32W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Maria Hasbany
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Kasey Colvin
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Louise Bexley
21W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Tricia Roos
19W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Devon Bowling
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.58
Leah Oliver
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Leigh Breunig
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Sunita Wardley
11W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
4
Brenda Talavera
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Karen Saland
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Tina Kimbell
12W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Heather Neilson
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.