Teams

Bonita National / Mitchell

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-02-28vs Worthington / KennedyWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Hall / Cindy Mitchell vs Robin Gale / Charlotte Wallis6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJenny Pohorence / Gina Fenton vs Mary M Maloy / Nancy Kennedy7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPamela Reilly / Karen Sirianni vs Ruth Conboy / Barbara Cavicchio6-3, 7-5
2025-02-21vs Lighthouse Bay / SoternWon 10
W#3 DoublesClaire Premo / Purnima Walavalkar vs Jill McKay / Carolyn Perrault2-1, 0-0
2025-01-24vs Worthington / KennedyWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Hall / Debra Allen vs Pat Brennan / Linda Zimmer6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesYvette Rudich / Lea Comet vs Charlotte Wallis / Maureen Peloquin7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesClaire Premo / Jenny Pohorence vs Joan Murphy / Ruth Conboy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Cindy Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Debra Allen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Purnima Walavalkar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Claire Premo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gina Fenton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Heather Hall
published
Karen Sirianni
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lea Comet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Taylor
published
Pamela Reilly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Forintos
published
Yvette Rudich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Sirianni + Pamela Reilly6163% gamesnot enough data
Yvette Rudich + Lea Comet3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cindy Mitchell
17W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Debra Allen
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Purnima Walavalkar
58W–53L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Claire Premo
16W–40L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Gina Fenton
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Heather Hall
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Sirianni
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lea Comet
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Taylor
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Reilly
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Forintos
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yvette Rudich
11W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.