Teams

Le.Wright40S

2025 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-20vs Ca.Robayo40SWon 10
W#2 SinglesKathryn Kiel vs Minh NguyenLe4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-14vs Sh.Leaver40SLost 02
L#1 SinglesKathryn Kiel vs Sharyn Leaver4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJennifer Kazmierczak vs Kristen Wassel2-6, 1-6
2025-07-13vs La.Cox40SLost 01
L#2 SinglesKatherine Canavan vs Laura Cox3-6, 3-6
2025-06-22vs Ma.Gonella40SLost 01
L#3 SinglesGinger Scanlon vs Sarah Overholser1-6, 2-6
2025-06-15vs Er.Wynia40SLost 02
L#2 SinglesJennifer Kazmierczak vs Erin Wynia1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMarilyn Slaymaker vs Lauren Fye0-6, 1-6
2025-06-08Won 10
W#2 SinglesKathryn Kiel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-01vs Ca.Robayo40SWon 10
W#2 SinglesKatherine Canavan vs Laura Rendon6-3, 6-3
2025-05-25vs La.Cox40SLost 02
L#2 SinglesGinger Scanlon vs Jennifer Anderson0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesKatherine Canavan vs Alison Kalinowski1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Katherine Canavan
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Kathryn Kiel
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Carrie Russell
published 3.5
3.26
Jennifer Kazmierczak
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Marilyn Slaymaker
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.76
Ginger Scanlon
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Kazmierczak + Carrie Russell6451% games+2.6% vs expected
Kathryn Kiel + Katherine Canavan12752% games+2.0% vs expected
Marilyn Slaymaker + Jennifer Kazmierczak9753% gamesnot enough data
Marilyn Slaymaker + Kathryn Kiel8266% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Kazmierczak + Katherine Canavan5456% gamesnot enough data
Marilyn Slaymaker + Katherine Canavan2347% gamesnot enough data
Kathryn Kiel + Jennifer Kazmierczak1444% gamesnot enough data
Marilyn Slaymaker + Ginger Scanlon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katherine Canavan
179W–116L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Kathryn Kiel
135W–120L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Carrie Russell
21W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Jennifer Kazmierczak
85W–90L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3
Marilyn Slaymaker
156W–103L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Ginger Scanlon
65W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.