Teams

Ma.Gonella40S

2025 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-20vs Er.Wynia40SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKimberly Durland vs Jennifer Kuzma5-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesElisabeth Van Order vs Amy Hobbs6-3, 6-2
2025-07-13vs As.Walker40SLost 01
L#1 SinglesElisabeth Van Order vs Lorraine Hall7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2025-07-06vs Ca.Robayo40SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Hilary Tew1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesCatie Cunningham vs Angelica Rose6-3, 6-4
2025-06-30vs La.Cox40SWon 10
W#1 SinglesElisabeth Van Order vs Jacqueline Crutcher6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-25vs Sh.Leaver40SWon 21
L#1 SinglesKimberly Durland vs Kristen Wassel4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesElisabeth Van Order vs Emily Kendall6-4, 3-6
W#3 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Shannon Beach3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-22vs Le.Wright40SWon 30
W#1 SinglesKimberly Durland vs Carrie Russell7-5, 6-0
W#2 SinglesElisabeth Van Order vs Leslie Wright6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Ginger Scanlon6-1, 6-2
2025-05-31vs As.Walker40SLost 02
L#1 SinglesKimberly Durland vs Christina Jenkins5-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMary Zimardo vs Amy Jones0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
3.56
Mary Zimardo
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Elisabeth Van Order
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Holly Camak
published 3.5
3.27
Kimberly Durland
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Carole Anne Hussey
published 3.5
3.08
Sarah Overholser
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Catie Cunningham
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elisabeth Van Order + Mary Zimardo224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Ann Gonella
20W–15L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Mary Zimardo
116W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.56
3.5
Elisabeth Van Order
78W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Holly Camak
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Kimberly Durland
208W–190L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Carole Anne Hussey
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Sarah Overholser
123W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Catie Cunningham
98W–63L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.