Teams

OC Rookies iTennis Cerritos - Nicholas

2023 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Men - 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-12-03vs OC Palisades - JoshLost 01
L#2 DoublesEli Alejo / Jonathan Tsang vs Kevin Kearney / Aaron Davenport7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2023-11-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / James Lucero vs Lance Mar / Alex Kao6-2, 6-3
2023-11-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / Eli Alejo vs Jason Pascua / Franco Trani6-2, 6-3
2023-11-05vs OC Palisades - JoshLost 01
L#3 DoublesEli Alejo / EDWARD CHOI vs Jeffrey Johnston / Paul Kincaid5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-10-29vs OC RCI - Mykael Sun1Split 11
L#2 DoublesEli Alejo / Edgar Munoz vs Ryan Agbayani / Allen Hoang4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / Nicolas Johnson vs Mykael Tran / Peter Heifetz6-4, 6-4
2023-10-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / Jonathan Tsang vs Thomas Hsu / Brooks Robinson6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesEli Alejo / Nicolas Johnson vs Andrew Finley / Daniel Keolasy4-6, 3-6
2023-10-08vs OC Los Cab - Danny Sat11Lost 02
L#2 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / Edgar Munoz vs Jamie Wei / Chris Lee2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMathew Gonzales / Eli Alejo vs Zachary Ambrosio / Franco Trani1-6, 2-6
2023-09-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / EDWARD CHOI vs Ben Chung / Jared Smith5-7, 4-6
2023-09-16vs OC LNRC - AviLost 01
L#2 DoublesEli Alejo / Hoang Kim Truong vs George Thaung / Erik Michelsen3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Men - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.56
EDWARD CHOI
published 5
4.26
Eli Alejo
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
James Lucero
published 4.5
4.20
Khoa Do
published
3.99
Nicholas Ambrosio
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.90
Hoang Kim Truong
published 4
3.88
Jonathan Tsang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Joshua Tesoro
published
Mathew Gonzales
published
Oliver Li
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Tsang + Eli Alejo2447% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
EDWARD CHOI
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.56
4.5
Eli Alejo
97W–73L career · 7 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
James Lucero
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Khoa Do
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Nicholas Ambrosio
90W–53L career · 6 lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.99
4
Hoang Kim Truong
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
Jonathan Tsang
50W–47L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
Joshua Tesoro
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mathew Gonzales
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Oliver Li
25W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.