Teams

For the love of the game

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over · Women 4.5 - 40 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 4.25 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-07-27vs Montana/Ziegler/40&Over4.5WLost 04
L#1 DoublesJennifer Nielson / Mary Ritchie vs Becky King / Paige Darden3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesSherrie Fuller-Benge vs AMY BELLAMAH-DANIEL1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJennifer Nicholson / Sarah Tilt vs Stacey Ziegler / Susie Luebbe2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKandy Chain / Gina Barham vs Joanne Sposito / Andrea Hier6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-07-27vs Montana/Ziegler/40&Over4.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Nicholson / Gina Barham vs Joanne Sposito / Susie Luebbe3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesIrma Spang / Catie Forsting vs Morgan Daley / Mary Lynn Weber4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Nielson / Mary Ritchie vs Becky King / Paige Darden4-6, 1-6
2024-07-26vs Montana/Ziegler/40&Over4.5WLost 04
L#1 DoublesKandy Chain / Ann Waters vs Stacey Ziegler / Susie Luebbe2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSherrie Fuller-Benge vs AMY BELLAMAH-DANIEL1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesIrma Spang / Catie Forsting vs Morgan Daley / Mary Lynn Weber6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Nielson / Mary Ritchie vs Becky King / Paige Darden6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 4.5 - 40 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Ziegler/40&Over4.5W30120385
2For the love of the game0301224143

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Mary Ritchie
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.98
Ann Waters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Sherrie Fuller-Benge
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Catie Forsting
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Gina Barham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Irma Spang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Nicholson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jennifer Nielson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sarah Tilt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Nielson + Mary Ritchie2645% games−7.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Mary Ritchie
36W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
4
Ann Waters
25W–15L career · type A · 1 line in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
Sherrie Fuller-Benge
19W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.83
Catie Forsting
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gina Barham
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Irma Spang
20W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Nicholson
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Nielson
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Tilt
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.