Teams

DTC RED

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-16vs CACM REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesDan Smink / Todd Wiebe vs Richard Lynn / Jeffrey Raval6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSteven Abelman vs Jay Rael2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Gardner / Chris Samuelson vs John Anadiotis / Nick Schroer2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Bunn / Howard Sankel vs David Duganne / Charles Greenhouse2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-07-09vs WP REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesHoward Sankel / Daniel Thomas vs Frankie Newman / Casper Lundemann1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCraig Johnson vs Chris Merman0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDan Smink / Chris Samuelson vs Brandon Gardner / Nick Nyffeler4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTodd Wiebe / Steven Abelman vs Brett Beard / Talwin Filholm6-3, 7-5
2024-07-02vs CM REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesDan Smink / Howard Sankel vs Chris Giblin / Taylor Weir4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDaniel Thomas vs George Armatas6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaul Bunn / David Tighe vs Lee Johnson / Paul Kluck6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesScott Cohen / Steven Abelman vs David Gordon / James Nottingham3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-06-25vs CP GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDaniel Thomas / Dan Smink vs Troy Kilen / Jeff Walters2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesSteven Abelman vs Peter Horsch0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesHoward Sankel / Craig Johnson vs Gary Beck / John Aloe6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChris Samuelson / Scott Cohen vs Eddie Sierra / Brian Friel6-2, 6-0
2024-06-18vs SKY GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesDaniel Thomas / Howard Sankel vs Brian Dwyer / Chris Boynton0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesChris Samuelson vs Paul von Glumer1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Johnson / David Tighe vs Craig Bouck / Chris Smith7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Gardner / Paul Bunn vs David Garrison / Jeff Hutcheson3-6, 3-6
2024-06-11vs CACM REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesDaniel Thomas / Dan Smink vs David Rich / Nick Schroer1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSteven Abelman vs Richard Lynn3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChris Samuelson / Craig Johnson vs John Anadiotis / Tony Chapin6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Tighe / John Gardner vs Jay Logan / David Duganne3-6, 0-6
2024-06-04vs WP REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesHoward Sankel / Daniel Thomas vs Frankie Newman / Casper Lundemann6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTodd Wiebe vs Mario Crobu2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDavid Tighe / Craig Johnson vs Talwin Filholm / Chris Merman6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaul Bunn / Scott Cohen vs Brett Beard / Edward Lucero6-0, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CSU GREEN7023514182
2RCC GREEN6123514195
3GAC RED5120411160
4GTC NAVY43151328229
5ATC GREEN33111332242
6EM BLUE24101433254
7CR-B BLUE2481634239
8LTFC NAVY2461836253
9MEA BLUE25101841293
10DTC RED2572145299
11LEBTC BLUE1581634263
12CP RED0762247318

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Daniel Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.39
Howard Sankel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.25
Todd Wiebe
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Dan Smink
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.02
Craig Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
3.00
Chris Samuelson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.97
David Tighe
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Paul Bunn
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Steven Abelman
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Johnson + Chris Samuelson4354% games+0.4% vs expected
Daniel Thomas + Todd Wiebe3551% games−0.1% vs expected
Daniel Thomas + Howard Sankel033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniel Thomas
9W–16L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
Howard Sankel
13W–13L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
3.39
3.5
Todd Wiebe
42W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Dan Smink
3W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.09
3
Craig Johnson
19W–23L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Chris Samuelson
12W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
3.5
David Tighe
35W–51L career · 4 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97
Paul Bunn
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Abelman
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.