Teams

GAC RED

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-16vs HRCA-N BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesJeremy Erdley / Jim Steavpack vs Mike Jaltuch / Erik Egtvedt4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesBruce Bendell vs Michael Giovannini6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Mulqueen / RUBEN GRADO vs Joe Stommel / John Hathorn6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJay Sandstrom / Christopher Stansbury vs RamaKeshav Rao / Gary Capps2-6, 3-6
2024-07-09vs SS-H BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesBruce Bendell / Brian Mulqueen vs Dennis Lezotte / Randall van Roekel7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesGregory Kaczmarczyk vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJeremy Erdley / RUBEN GRADO vs Joel Gesink / Charles Viss6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlexander Sobolevsky / Jay Sandstrom vs Jerry Barnhill / Patrick Broe1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-07-02vs ATC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesBruce Bendell / Brian Mulqueen vs Richard Heppe / Paul Ivancie6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJeremy Erdley vs Craig Petersen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJim Steavpack / Gregory Kaczmarczyk vs Buck Dominick / Jeffrey Jones6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJay Sandstrom / Jim Gruber vs James Sigman / Bill Short7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2024-06-25vs HV YELLOWLost 04
L#1 DoublesJeremy Erdley / Alexander Sobolevsky vs Loren Bontrager / Mark Figley2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJim Steavpack vs Peter Sjoberg0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGregory Kaczmarczyk / Brian Mulqueen vs Scott Cohen / Andrew Leonard2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJay Sandstrom / Christopher Stansbury vs Brian Balderston / Cody Gale2-6, 2-6
2024-06-18vs FOX PURPLEWon 31
W#1 DoublesBrian Mulqueen / Bruce Bendell vs Bob Louden / Ben Edmonds7-6, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJim Steavpack vs John Zimmer6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGregory Kaczmarczyk / RUBEN GRADO vs David Peakman / Matt Canetto7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeremy Erdley / Jay Sandstrom vs Keith Zaring / Steven Huffman6-0, 6-0
2024-06-11vs WC BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesJim Steavpack / Brian Mulqueen vs Tim Wilson / Michael Doherty1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBruce Bendell vs Kevin Moragne2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesChristopher Stansbury / Gregory Kaczmarczyk vs Henry Sanin / Stefan Paulsson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJay Sandstrom / RUBEN GRADO vs Steve Pulver / Brad Lewis3-6, 2-6
2024-06-04vs LTFC YELLOWLost 13
L#1 DoublesRUBEN GRADO / Gregory Kaczmarczyk vs Dustin Gonzales / Sean Allen3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJeremy Erdley vs Edward Hynek5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJim Steavpack / Christopher Stansbury vs Bryan Kortum / Scott Ungar3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJay Sandstrom / Alexander Sobolevsky vs Brandon Stovall / Jonathan Moore3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CSU GREEN7023514182
2RCC GREEN6123514195
3GAC RED5120411160
4GTC NAVY43151328229
5ATC GREEN33111332242
6EM BLUE24101433254
7CR-B BLUE2481634239
8LTFC NAVY2461836253
9MEA BLUE25101841293
10DTC RED2572145299
11LEBTC BLUE1581634263
12CP RED0762247318

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Bruce Bendell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
RUBEN GRADO
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Jeremy Erdley
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Brian Mulqueen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Christopher Stansbury
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Alexander Sobolevsky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Jay Sandstrom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Gregory Kaczmarczyk
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.14
Jim Steavpack
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jim Gruber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruce Bendell + Brian Mulqueen4152% games+0.9% vs expected
Jay Sandstrom + Brian Mulqueen2344% gamesnot enough data
Jay Sandstrom + RUBEN GRADO044 matchesnot enough data
RUBEN GRADO + Gregory Kaczmarczyk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bruce Bendell
20W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
RUBEN GRADO
21W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
Jeremy Erdley
20W–18L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Brian Mulqueen
53W–43L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Christopher Stansbury
0W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Alexander Sobolevsky
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Jay Sandstrom
60W–83L career · 7 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Gregory Kaczmarczyk
22W–35L career · 6 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Jim Steavpack
73W–85L career · 6 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Jim Gruber
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.