Teams

Dover 40+ 3.5M Singles Mon PM

2025 Piedmont Singles 40+ · 3.5 Men Singles Mon

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-28vs Bangay 40+ 3.5M Singles Mon PMWon 30
W#1 SinglesSteven Delamar vs Chris Sigley6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBryan Bly vs Todd Eckle7-6, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAshley Fuquay vs Adam Winkel6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJohn Blekicki vs Toni Rodriguez2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesChristopher Moser vs Amos Quick5-7, 3-6
W#3 SinglesBenjamin Rainwater vs Stephen Moore6-2, 6-0
2025-07-07vs Hilliard 40+ 3.5M Singles Mon PMWon 20
W#1 SinglesSteven Delamar vs Robert Lynch2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLuke Rhoten vs Grayson Blow6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJohn Blekicki vs Joseph Speight6-7, 6-7
W#2 SinglesAshley Fuquay vs Ames Chamberlin6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKevin Dover vs Cory Barber6-0, 6-1
2025-06-23vs Bangay 40+ 3.5M Singles Mon PMWon 20
W#1 SinglesAshley Fuquay vs Dave Foster6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesChristopher Moser vs Adam Winkel6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSteven Delamar vs Toni Rodriguez4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBryan Bly vs Tanvir Chodri6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesBenjamin Rainwater vs A. Kobi-Jackson6-1, 6-0
2025-06-02vs Hilliard 40+ 3.5M Singles Mon PMSplit 11
L#1 SinglesBryan Bly vs Matthew Dunning0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesKevin Dover vs Robert Lynch6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesChristopher Moser vs Joseph Speight6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJohn Blekicki vs Ryan Brevda7-6, 6-3
W#3 SinglesLuke Rhoten vs Seth Marshall4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men Singles Mon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Kevin Dover
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.57
Luke Rhoten
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.50
Benjamin Rainwater
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Ashley Fuquay
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Bryan Bly
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Christopher Moser
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Steven Delamar
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
John Blekicki
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Dover
45W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
Luke Rhoten
49W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Benjamin Rainwater
29W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Ashley Fuquay
34W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Bryan Bly
37W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Christopher Moser
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Steven Delamar
20W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
John Blekicki
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.