Teams

Hilliard 40+ 3.5M Singles Mon PM

2025 Piedmont Singles 40+ · 3.5 Men Singles Mon

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 SinglesHouston Core vs Seth Marshall6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMatthew Dunning vs Ames Chamberlin4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 SinglesGrayson Blow vs Jason Beuchler7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRobert Davis vs Toni Rodriguez2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesChris Hanger vs Stephen Moore6-3, 7-6
L#3 SinglesScott Laughlin vs Tanvir Chodri6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-07-07vs Dover 40+ 3.5M Singles Mon PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesRobert Lynch vs Steven Delamar6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesGrayson Blow vs Luke Rhoten3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesChris Hanger vs Will Martin6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKevin Womble vs Seth Marshall6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRobert Davis vs Ryan Brevda7-5, 6-0
L#3 SinglesScott Laughlin vs Ames Chamberlin6-7, 0-6
2025-06-22vs Bangay 40+ 3.5M Singles Mon PMWon 30
W#1 SinglesRobert Davis vs Todd Eckle6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesGrayson Blow vs Dave Foster6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMatthew Dunning vs Vikram Penumalli6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesScott Laughlin vs Stephen Moore7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKevin Womble vs Amos Quick6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRobert Lynch vs Toni Rodriguez5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2025-06-02vs Dover 40+ 3.5M Singles Mon PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesMatthew Dunning vs Bryan Bly6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesGrayson Blow vs Will Martin6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesRobert Lynch vs Kevin Dover3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men Singles Mon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Robert Davis
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.54
Houston Core
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.51
Matthew Dunning
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.47
Ryan Hilliard
published
3.46
Robert Lynch
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.45
Kevin Womble
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.42
Scott Laughlin
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.42
Chris Hanger
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Grayson Blow
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Grayson Blow + Houston Core213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Davis
41W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
Houston Core
31W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
Matthew Dunning
33W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Ryan Hilliard
39W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Robert Lynch
16W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Kevin Womble
26W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Scott Laughlin
11W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Chris Hanger
30W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Grayson Blow
25W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.