Teams

GEPTA-7.0-Adult/55+M(Michnovicz)(Lions)-LC)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings6 teams · 2024 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Tepsick/55&over/7.0M8221927235
2GEPTA-7.0-Adult/55+M(Kim)(FB)73171332247
3GEPTA-7.0-Adult/55+M(Bezemek)(EPTC#1)64181229261
4GEPTA-7.0-Adult/55+M(Daw)(EPCC)35111332242
5GEPTA-7.0-Adult/55+M(Michnovicz)(Lions)-LC)36131431233
6GEPTA-7.0-Adult/55+M(Rafaeian)(EPTC#2)1842347290

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
David Coyle
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Carl Conley
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
2.88
Andrew Michnovicz
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published 3
Floyd Ransom
published
Gilbert Amezquita
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
James McCleland
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
John Trujillo
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Patrick Morandi
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Pete Dinger
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Susumu Yasuda
usually #1 Doubles 65%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Victor Ruiz
usually #1 Doubles 91%, also #2 Doubles 9% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Michnovicz + Carl Conley12461% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Morandi + Carl Conley7259% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Michnovicz + Gilbert Amezquita5353% gamesnot enough data
Susumu Yasuda + Victor Ruiz4158% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Morandi + John Trujillo404 matchesnot enough data
James McCleland + David Coyle314 matchesnot enough data
Susumu Yasuda + John Trujillo213 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Michnovicz + Pete Dinger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Coyle
27W–23L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Carl Conley
22W–12L career · 16 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Andrew Michnovicz
108W–70L career · 24 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
Floyd Ransom
14W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Gilbert Amezquita
42W–28L career · 12 lines in 2024
not enough data
James McCleland
69W–65L career · 36 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Trujillo
36W–27L career · 19 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patrick Morandi
22W–15L career · 19 lines in 2024
not enough data
Pete Dinger
24W–16L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susumu Yasuda
15W–12L career · 17 lines in 2024
not enough data
Victor Ruiz
34W–6L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.