Teams

GEPTA-7.0-Adult/55+M(Rafaeian)(EPTC#2)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-06-30Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJon Bardouche / Sam Guido vs Greg Daw / Edgar Borrego1-6, 1-6
2024-06-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesManouchehr Refaeian / Jon Bardouche vs David Coyle / James McCleland4-6, 2-6
2024-06-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJon Bardouche / Manouchehr Refaeian vs Angel Garcia / Roger Gonzalez2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-06-06Lost 01
L#3 DoublesManouchehr Refaeian / Jon Bardouche vs Michael Bezemek / Jorge Kareh4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 2024 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Tepsick/55&over/7.0M8221927235
2GEPTA-7.0-Adult/55+M(Kim)(FB)73171332247
3GEPTA-7.0-Adult/55+M(Bezemek)(EPTC#1)64181229261
4GEPTA-7.0-Adult/55+M(Daw)(EPCC)35111332242
5GEPTA-7.0-Adult/55+M(Michnovicz)(Lions)-LC)36131431233
6GEPTA-7.0-Adult/55+M(Rafaeian)(EPTC#2)1842347290

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Dennis Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
Gerardo Gomez
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Greg Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Jon Bardouche
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Ken O'Neal
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Manouchehr Refaeian
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Randall Studdard
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Sam Guido
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Syed Yusoof
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randall Studdard + Gerardo Gomez6355% gamesnot enough data
Manouchehr Refaeian + Jon Bardouche033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dennis Rodriguez
45W–57L career · 45 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Gerardo Gomez
52W–48L career · 32 lines in 2024
not enough data
Greg Garcia
32W–51L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jon Bardouche
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ken O'Neal
9W–33L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
Manouchehr Refaeian
112W–93L career · 23 lines in 2024
not enough data
Randall Studdard
32W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sam Guido
9W–15L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data
Syed Yusoof
9W–45L career · 27 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.