Teams

GOLD RIVER RC 18AM4.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.5

19 players · average NTRP 4.22 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Jacob Toombs
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
Amar Khangura
published 4.5
4.26
Andrea Sartori
published 4.5
4.08
Dana Nuccitelli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.03
Oliver Wreford
published
3.93
Rajan Gosain
published
3.89
Aleksandr A Bgatov
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.89
Alex Bychkoviak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.84
Todd Humphrey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Kamesh Vedula
published
3.81
Pranesh Thirukkonda
published
3.77
Gregory Mclean
published 4.5
3.75
Roland Reese
published
3.71
Greg Ingram
published 4
3.71
Matthew Ryan
published
3.70
John Pruett
published
3.70
3.67
Jeff Thurston
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Amit Srivastava
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Nuccitelli + Todd Humphrey7453% games+9.3% vs expected
Alex Bychkoviak + Aleksandr A Bgatov6253% games−9.4% vs expected
Pranesh Thirukkonda + Roland Reese123 matchesnot enough data
Rajan Gosain + Andrea Sartori033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jacob Toombs
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
4.37
4.5
Amar Khangura
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Andrea Sartori
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
4.26
4
Dana Nuccitelli
25W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%28%72%
4.08
Oliver Wreford
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03
Rajan Gosain
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Aleksandr A Bgatov
27W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Alex Bychkoviak
26W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
Todd Humphrey
25W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.84
Kamesh Vedula
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
Pranesh Thirukkonda
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.81
4.5
Gregory Mclean
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.77
Roland Reese
18W–26L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Greg Ingram
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Matthew Ryan
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
John Pruett
0W–11L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.70
Nandakumar Natarajan
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Jeff Thurston
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Amit Srivastava
4W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.