Teams

Team 13 Party at the Net

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-19vs Team 12 Net JobsWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaryn DeVito / Effie Hoffman vs Lynne Aoyama / Marcy Davidson6-4, 6-3
2023-03-05vs Team 11 Slice GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaryn DeVito / Marguerite McFadden vs Ayako Doi / Elisa Leak6-2, 6-2
2023-02-24vs Team 4 Sassy SmashersWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaryn DeVito / Marguerite McFadden vs Venita Cooper / April Rabayda6-2, 6-3
2023-02-10vs Team 10 Loosely StrungWon 10
W#2 DoublesEffie Hoffman / Karyn DeVito vs Linda Dinga / Karen Keller6-1, 6-3
2023-02-01vs Team 9 VolleyVixensSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKaryn DeVito vs Debra Ciesar6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlison Lopez / Karen McNeice vs Jann Cassady / Sara Franklin1-6, 4-6
2023-01-27vs Team 8 TrilogyLost 01
L#1 DoublesHilary Dixon / Marguerite McFadden vs Jennifer Gatewood / Nancy Sicairos2-6, 1-6
2023-01-11vs Team 6 Simply SmashingWon 20
W#1 DoublesTara Reynolds / Marguerite McFadden vs Donna Biderman / Ann Bauer6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKaryn DeVito vs Paula Fitzgerald6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Tara Reynolds
published
3.40
Karyn DeVito
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Marguerite McFadden
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Effie Hoffman
published 3
2.90
Olga Minsky
published
2.88
Kristy Mathey
published
2.84
Alison Lopez
published 3
2.66
Hilary Dixon
published 3
2.56
Karen McNeice
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Robin Crawford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marguerite McFadden + Karyn DeVito261653% games+1.4% vs expected
Alison Lopez + Karen McNeice123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tara Reynolds
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Karyn DeVito
141W–116L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Marguerite McFadden
95W–75L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3
Effie Hoffman
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
Olga Minsky
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
Kristy Mathey
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Alison Lopez
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Hilary Dixon
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Karen McNeice
42W–55L career · 1 line in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
Robin Crawford
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.