Teams

Team 11 Slice Girls

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-03-18Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCaroline McMahon / Kristin Kahn vs Linda Oberleitner / Jenny Cage3-6, 2-6
2023-03-09vs Team 2Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKylie Gaskins / Margaret Roberts vs Ann Ballard / Jenifer Heilig2-6, 1-6
2023-03-05vs Team 13 Party at the NetLost 01
L#1 SinglesKristin Kahn vs Hilary Dixon4-6, 6-7
2023-02-22vs Team 9 VolleyVixensLost 01
L#2 DoublesKristin Kahn / Joanne Swain vs Laurie Oberembt / Cindy Weinberg5-7, 0-6
2023-02-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Corcoran / Kristin Kahn vs Donna Biderman / Michelle Parris6-3, 6-4
2023-02-11vs Team 12 Net JobsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDanezza Quintero-Medina / Kylie Gaskins vs Lynnita Montague-Daddio / Rosy Mcgillan6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnne Gauthier / Laura Mattis vs Lynne Aoyama / Marcy Davidson4-6, 1-6
2023-02-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesKristin Kahn / Ashley Vroman-Lee vs Ramona Batchelder / Jeannie Ng3-6, 6-1
2023-02-04Won 20
W#1 DoublesKristin Kahn / Yvette Chisholm vs Heather Hall / Dina MacKney6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElisa Leak / Laura Mattis vs Rose Viozzi / Boriana Chopova6-1, 6-1
2023-01-22vs Team 8 TrilogyLost 02
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Corcoran / Kylie Gaskins vs Ashley Plexico / Jennifer Gatewood4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKristin Kahn vs Eleanor McManus7-6, 0-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Kristin Kahn
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.00
Kylie Gaskins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Laura Mattis
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.56
Ayako Doi
published 3
1.96
Anne Gauthier
published 2.5
Elisa Leak
published
Helen Zassypkina
published
Tara Rethore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Kahn + Kylie Gaskins8559% games+1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kristin Kahn
128W–147L career · type A · 7 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.04
3
Kylie Gaskins
140W–132L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Laura Mattis
77W–98L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Ayako Doi
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Anne Gauthier
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Elisa Leak
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Helen Zassypkina
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tara Rethore
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.