Teams

Lange/Rouse

2021 55&Over Women · 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-25vs MetcalfLost 03
L#1 DoublesJudy Allen / Rachel Bigby vs Jennifer Gavilondo / Linda Crawford4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTeresa Metcalfe / Judith Paul vs Elaine Heekin / Mary Kaye1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNeerja Bhatnagar / Lisa Lange vs Christine Douglas / Kathleen Metcalf0-6, 1-6
2021-08-18vs Western: Dickson/HayashiLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatti Mahar / Judy Allen vs Carri Moore / Karen Nardella5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Desrosiers / Elizabeth Schuber vs Gyata Stormon / Bodhi Borer5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesRachel Bigby / Alice Lewis-Hickey vs Judy Tracy / Mara Mulligan6-1, 6-2
2021-08-04vs MetcalfLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlice Lewis-Hickey / Rachel Bigby vs Jennifer Gavilondo / Alison Rutter6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTeresa Metcalfe / Elizabeth Schuber vs Elaine Heekin / Mary Kaye5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah McKnight / Neerja Bhatnagar vs Christine Douglas / Kathleen Metcalf5-7, 6-7
2021-07-28vs Western: Dickson/HayashiLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlice Lewis-Hickey / Rachel Bigby vs Lucy Martin / Julie Grossman6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLynn Pierce-Morey / Neerja Bhatnagar vs Atsuko Hayashi / Judy Chen2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesVictoria Briggs / Judith Paul vs Gyata Stormon / Bodhi Borer1-6, 0-6
2021-07-14vs MetcalfLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Gavilondo / Alison Rutter vs Alice Lewis-Hickey / Deborah McKnight - *4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTeresa Metcalfe / Rachel Bigby vs Elaine Heekin / Mary Kaye4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPatti Mahar / Lynn Pierce-Morey vs Kathleen Metcalf / Bee Tolman6-1, 7-6
2021-07-07vs Western: Dickson/HayashiWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlice Lewis-Hickey / Lynn Pierce-Morey vs Julie Grossman / Lucy Martin7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRachel Bigby / Elizabeth Schuber vs Bodhi Borer / Gyata Stormon4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVictoria Briggs / Judy Allen vs Judy Chen / Atsuko Hayashi3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Dickson/Hayashi5111716150
2Metcalf3310820163
3Lange/Rouse1561225181

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Elizabeth Schuber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Alice Lewis-Hickey
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.66
Deborah McKnight
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Rachel Bigby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Neerja Bhatnagar
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Teresa Metcalfe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Judy Allen
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Lisa Lange
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lynn Pierce-Morey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Maura Rouse
published
Patti Mahar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Renee Desrosiers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Victoria Briggs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah McKnight + Alice Lewis-Hickey20761% games+6.7% vs expected
Alice Lewis-Hickey + Rachel Bigby6265% games+4.7% vs expected
Neerja Bhatnagar + Judy Allen11362% games+3.9% vs expected
Teresa Metcalfe + Maura Rouse12368% games+1.2% vs expected
Elizabeth Schuber + Rachel Bigby5154% games+0.9% vs expected
Lynn Pierce-Morey + Judy Allen224 matchesnot enough data
Neerja Bhatnagar + Lisa Lange314 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Metcalfe + Rachel Bigby033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Schuber
105W–47L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Alice Lewis-Hickey
119W–68L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Deborah McKnight
56W–48L career · 2 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.66
Rachel Bigby
32W–28L career · 6 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Neerja Bhatnagar
114W–73L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Teresa Metcalfe
58W–83L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Judy Allen
116W–107L career · 8 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Lisa Lange
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Lynn Pierce-Morey
42W–23L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Maura Rouse
48W–14L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Patti Mahar
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Renee Desrosiers
18W–14L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Victoria Briggs
31W–19L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.