Teams

MVC Wassenaar WSL A18-4.0W

2026 WMI WSL Adult 18&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI WSL A18&O 4.0 W (8 player)

18 players · average NTRP 3.70 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-22vs PTC Mast WSL A18-4.0WLost 14
L#1 DoublesWanlapawadee Orellana / Gretchen Townshend vs Meredith Mast / Brittnee Tomlin1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesClaire Wolters vs Jennifer Amante2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesErin Fouty / Hollie Peerboom vs Mary Muller / Julie Kienast2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesSarah Armbruster vs Lan Nguyen6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesPam Rush / Patty Reilly vs Sherri Lawrence / Elizabeth Patrick2-6, 3-6
2026-05-15vs MY Harris WSL A18-4.0WWon 31
W#1 DoublesClaire Wolters / Jennie Wassenaar vs Carmen Harris / Leslie Kepplinger7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDanuta Radzio vs Amber Sample0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPatty Reilly / Pam Rush vs Diane Dirette / Elizabeth Lekosiotis2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJen Kushak vs Cary Sullivan6-2, 6-2
2026-05-01vs HC Irish WSL A18-4.0WLost 23
W#1 DoublesGretchen Townshend / Wanlapawadee Orellana vs Mindy Koschmann / Cara Dykstra2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRachel Ogilvie vs Kerri Stoel0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesErin Fouty / Natsuko Tsutsumi Buckhold vs Rachel Haan / Olivia Brower3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Armbruster vs Kendra Scheerhorn1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKate Vincent / Patty Reilly vs Luann Mullen / Michelle Daane4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-04-17vs MVC Lee WSL A18-4.0WLost 05
L#1 DoublesErin Fouty / Rachel Ogilvie vs Kerry Clay / Sharon Barnes2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBrooke Kushak vs Kristen Snyder2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDawn Wolownik / Kate Vincent vs Amy McKenzie / Marie Shea4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSarah Armbruster vs Teresa Nelson0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarri Wurm / Mia Helweg vs Sabina Centner / Stacy Ehrlich3-6, 5-6
2026-04-03vs MVH Davis WSL A18-4.0WLost 13
W#1 DoublesWanlapawadee Orellana / Dawn Wolownik vs Beth Post / Linda Schnobel6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrooke Kushak vs Ann Dawson4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Armbruster / Carri Wurm vs Joan Kroeze / Carol Genzink6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDanuta Radzio / Kate Vincent vs Donna Jorritsma / Heather Davis1-6, 3-6
2026-03-13vs WH Lowes WSL A18-4.0WSplit 22
W#1 DoublesClaire Wolters / Wanlapawadee Orellana vs Terri Beattie / Stephanie Lowes6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBrooke Kushak vs Marjori Cantwell3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Armbruster / Dawn Wolownik vs Ann Wright / Jennifer Dougherty6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDanuta Radzio vs Lori Green0-6, 4-6
2026-02-27vs GR Tawney WSL A18-40WLost 13
L#1 DoublesClaire Wolters / Wanlapawadee Orellana vs Katie Gingras / Cynthia Papp3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarri Wurm / Hollie Peerboom vs Kimberly Johnson / Naoko Kobrak0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesBrooke Kushak vs Pauline Unfried6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJennie Wassenaar / Patty Reilly vs Gayl Kessel / Tricia Lyon2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-02-06vs MVC Klingenberg WSL A18-4.0WLost 14
L#1 DoublesErin Fouty / Dawn Wolownik vs Julie Sachau / Maggie Stewart2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBrooke Kushak vs Rose Waypa3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarri Wurm / Natsuko Tsutsumi Buckhold vs Ally McCall / Elizabeth Terhorst1-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesSarah Armbruster vs Emily Oosterhouse1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKate Vincent / Rachel Ogilvie vs Andrea Wolfe / Jacqui VandenToorn7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · WMI WSL A18&O 4.0 W (8 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MVC Lee WSL A18-4.0W8031924256
2MVC Klingenberg WSL A18-4.0W71291128288
3MVH Davis WSL A18-4.0W53221845350
4PTC Mast WSL A18-4.0W44221835312
5HC Irish WSL A18-4.0W44182251373
6MY Harris WSL A18-4.0W35162453380
7MVC Wassenaar WSL A18-4.0W26152556377
8GR Tawney WSL A18-40W26152558403
9WH Lowes WSL A18-4.0W17122861406

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Brooke Kushak
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.67
Claire Wolters
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.53
Natsuko Tsutsumi Buckhold
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.51
Jen Kushak
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.46
Carri Wurm
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.46
Jennie Wassenaar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Wanlapawadee Orellana
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.35
Gretchen Townshend
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.35
Dawn Wolownik
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.34
Rachel Ogilvie
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
3.33
Danuta Radzio
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Erin Fouty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Pam Rush
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Sarah Armbruster
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.21
Kate Vincent
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Mia Helweg
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.12
Hollie Peerboom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Patty Reilly
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carri Wurm + Claire Wolters5065% games+12.4% vs expected
Dawn Wolownik + Wanlapawadee Orellana14360% games+12.0% vs expected
Wanlapawadee Orellana + Claire Wolters18562% games+11.9% vs expected
Kate Vincent + Rachel Ogilvie16857% games+9.6% vs expected
Sarah Armbruster + Wanlapawadee Orellana11850% games+9.3% vs expected
Carri Wurm + Kate Vincent4351% games+7.6% vs expected
Gretchen Townshend + Claire Wolters10461% games+4.7% vs expected
Mia Helweg + Rachel Ogilvie21045% games+4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brooke Kushak
15W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Claire Wolters
86W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Natsuko Tsutsumi Buckhold
133W–58L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.53
Jen Kushak
35W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Carri Wurm
35W–21L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Jennie Wassenaar
58W–73L career · 2 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
3.46
Wanlapawadee Orellana
101W–35L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
Gretchen Townshend
65W–35L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Dawn Wolownik
98W–88L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Rachel Ogilvie
70W–98L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Danuta Radzio
111W–109L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
Erin Fouty
59W–94L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Pam Rush
104W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Sarah Armbruster
77W–56L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.22
Kate Vincent
142W–97L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.21
Mia Helweg
51W–65L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Hollie Peerboom
50W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Patty Reilly
87W–40L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.