Teams

MY Harris WSL A18-4.0W

2026 WMI WSL Adult 18&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI WSL A18&O 4.0 W (8 player)

17 players · average NTRP 3.83 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-29vs WH Lowes WSL A18-4.0WSplit 22
W#1 DoublesRonda Stafford / Kristin Bellino vs Marjori Cantwell / Shimwe Sentya6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCarol Heinicke vs Mauri VanDenBerg5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Worgess / Anne Rajkovich vs Lori Green / Stephanie Lowes6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDiane Dirette / Julie Kennedy vs Ann Wright / Jennifer Dougherty2-6, 0-6
2026-05-15vs MVC Wassenaar WSL A18-4.0WLost 13
L#1 DoublesCarmen Harris / Leslie Kepplinger vs Claire Wolters / Jennie Wassenaar5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAmber Sample vs Danuta Radzio6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDiane Dirette / Elizabeth Lekosiotis vs Patty Reilly / Pam Rush6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCary Sullivan vs Jen Kushak2-6, 2-6
2026-05-08vs GR Tawney WSL A18-40WWon 32
W#1 DoublesCarol Heinicke / Anne Rajkovich vs Naoko Kobrak / Mary Kate Fulghum6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAmber Sample vs Katie Gingras6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarmen Harris / Lauren Worgess vs Marci Tawney / Cynthia Papp7-6, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLeslie Kepplinger vs Jessica Zeilstra3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGlorianna Fogarty / Elizabeth Lekosiotis vs Gayl Kessel / Julie Gardzinski0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-05-01vs PTC Mast WSL A18-4.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Rajkovich / Amber Sample vs Yunju Lee / Brittnee Tomlin3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarmen Harris / Elizabeth Lekosiotis vs Karen Bell / Mary Muller1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGlorianna Fogarty / Leslie Kepplinger vs Christina Sanchez-Martin / Joan Hannadarrell4-6, 0-6
2026-04-17vs MVC Klingenberg WSL A18-4.0WLost 14
L#1 DoublesLauren Worgess / Carol Heinicke vs Molly McNamara / Julie Sachau5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSarah Abramson vs Amber Slater4-6, 5-2
L#2 DoublesCary Sullivan / Glorianna Fogarty vs Kim Tucker / Gretchen Asfour4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesPatricia Skinner vs Emily Oosterhouse6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLeslie Kepplinger / Julie Kennedy vs Andrea Wolfe / Jacqui VandenToorn1-6, 2-6
2026-03-13vs MVH Davis WSL A18-4.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmber Sample / Carol Heinicke vs Beth Post / Linda Schnobel3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRonda Stafford / Kristin Bellino vs Donna Jorritsma / Emily Van Faasen4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnne Rajkovich / Diane Dirette vs Kathy Kroeze / Kathy Labozzetta6-1, 6-0
2026-03-06vs HC Irish WSL A18-4.0WWon 31
L#1 DoublesKayla Monti / Ronda Stafford vs Mindy Koschmann / Rachel TenHarmsel3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmber Sample vs Luann Mullen3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Rajkovich / Lauren Worgess vs Olivia Brower / Jasmine Irish3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Abramson / Carol Heinicke vs Tracy Harrison / Carrita Plaskewicz7-6, 6-2
2026-02-20vs MVC Lee WSL A18-4.0WLost 23
L#1 DoublesRonda Stafford / Kristin Bellino vs Sarah Williams / Michelle Krick6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKayla Monti vs Julie Ludden6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Rajkovich / Cary Sullivan vs Amy McKenzie / Kerry Clay2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesPatricia Skinner vs Irina Leyfman4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAmber Sample / Julie Kennedy vs Sharon Barnes / Stacy Ehrlich0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · WMI WSL A18&O 4.0 W (8 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MVC Lee WSL A18-4.0W8031924256
2MVC Klingenberg WSL A18-4.0W71291128288
3MVH Davis WSL A18-4.0W53221845350
4PTC Mast WSL A18-4.0W44221835312
5HC Irish WSL A18-4.0W44182251373
6MY Harris WSL A18-4.0W35162453380
7MVC Wassenaar WSL A18-4.0W26152556377
8GR Tawney WSL A18-40W26152558403
9WH Lowes WSL A18-4.0W17122861406

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Kayla Monti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Carmen Harris
published 4
3.75
Kristin Bellino
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Lauren Worgess
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.65
Ronda Stafford
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.62
Amber Sample
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Anne Rajkovich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Carol Heinicke
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.45
Sarah Abramson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.26
Cary Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Patricia Skinner
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.18
Diane Dirette
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Elizabeth Lekosiotis
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published
3.11
Yit-Yian Lua
published
3.09
Glorianna Fogarty
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
3.07
Leslie Kepplinger
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
2.92
Julie Kennedy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Rajkovich + Ronda Stafford7261% games+9.7% vs expected
Cary Sullivan + Diane Dirette6265% games+8.6% vs expected
Carol Heinicke + Ronda Stafford10948% games+7.3% vs expected
Glorianna Fogarty + Yit-Yian Lua9550% games+6.7% vs expected
Leslie Kepplinger + Cary Sullivan3545% games+6.6% vs expected
Glorianna Fogarty + Cary Sullivan151850% games+3.1% vs expected
Cary Sullivan + Elizabeth Lekosiotis10851% games+2.1% vs expected
Lauren Worgess + Ronda Stafford10950% games−0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kayla Monti
37W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Carmen Harris
31W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristin Bellino
21W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Lauren Worgess
55W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
Ronda Stafford
115W–147L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Amber Sample
37W–38L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Anne Rajkovich
68W–60L career · 6 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.62
4
Carol Heinicke
116W–154L career · 5 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.57
Sarah Abramson
76W–111L career · 2 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Cary Sullivan
94W–96L career · 10 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
Patricia Skinner
13W–35L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Diane Dirette
86W–146L career · 8 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Elizabeth Lekosiotis
63W–100L career · 11 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Yit-Yian Lua
24W–39L career · no lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.11
Glorianna Fogarty
111W–219L career · 13 lines in 2026
26%73%<1%
3.09
Leslie Kepplinger
29W–126L career · 10 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Julie Kennedy
39W–63L career · 3 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.