Teams

Wise Aces (Flexible)

2021 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-13vs Havin' a ballLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Clemente / Natalie Pryde vs Anna Duff / Kimberly Stein2-6, 3-6
2021-07-27vs Sky'sTheLimitLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Clemente / Natalie Pryde vs Danxia Chen / Yamin Wang2-6, 6-7
2021-07-26vs velazquezWon 10
W#1 DoublesNatalie Pryde / Jennifer Clemente vs Venus Velazquez / Mila Niset6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-07-21vs HawksClawMart (Flexible)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Clemente / Kathryn Carlsen vs Paula Holtzclaw / Heidi Martin1-6, 3-6
2021-06-30vs VanChaneyLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathryn Carlsen / Natalie Pryde vs Sun Chaney / Jackie Vandenberg1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-06-09vs Game, Set, Lunch!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGina Gentry / Kathryn Carlsen vs Jill Lang / Heather Morrow1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings36 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Dori 1 & 2 (Flexible)6060123
2Flexible6060240
3Best Frinners (Flexible)6060239
4Point of No Return5151232
5Scher/Taylor/Edwards5151235
6Ferrari Acers5151344
7Game, Set, Lunch!5151450
8Balls on Fire5151442
9VanChaney5151543
10Net crackers5151562
11the chonks4242443
12Summer Fun-Box4242552
13Mini Party4242659
14Net Results4242652
15Dare U 2 Hit That3333647
16Ohhhh NO (Flexible)3333649
17McKay/Bowser3333650
18NECK in the Sun3333645
19Sky'sTheLimit3333750
20Havin' a ball3333759
21Let's play tennis (Flexible)3333750
22HawksClawMart (Flexible)3333863
23McKenny/Finnan (Flexible)2424857
24MI Poachers2424862
25Anderson2424968
26Summer Fun-Skotdal2424965
27It's All Good24241071
28Double Fun15151167
29Wise Aces (Flexible)15151170
30Hanson's Hero's15151175
31Millertime05051059
32Vika05051061
33Atwood05051057
34Fierce Katz05051061
35Korch06061271
36Schilling/Scallon06061272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Natalie Pryde
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Kathryn Carlsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Jennifer Clemente
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Gina Gentry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Pryde + Jennifer Clemente224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Natalie Pryde
112W–82L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.96
3.5
Kathryn Carlsen
17W–29L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Jennifer Clemente
86W–90L career · 8 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Gina Gentry
14W–23L career · 1 line in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.