Teams

WESF:Westfit:Luneau

2026 EMA Tri Level Winter · Spring

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-23vs WTC:Winchester:AtkinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJuana Luneau / Dianthe Doldo vs Julia Lefler / Allison Vizgaitis2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-01vs LFW:Longfellow:CunnighamLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Girasole / Jaclyn Race vs Jennifer Cunningham / Kim Morris6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-05-27vs LFW:Longfellow:CunnighamLost 01
L#1 DoublesJuana Luneau / Dianthe Doldo vs Jennifer Cunningham / Kim Morris3-6, 2-6
2026-05-27vs WTC:Winchester:AtkinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Girasole / Jaclyn Race vs Alisa Atkins / Julia Lefler7-6, 6-3
2026-05-19vs LFW:Longfellow:CunnighamWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Girasole / Jaclyn Race vs Kim Morris / Alison Garcia Wilson6-4, 6-4
2026-05-19vs WTC:Winchester:AtkinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJuana Luneau / Dianthe Doldo vs Julia Lefler / Rielly Malz7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LFW:Longfellow:Cunnigham0651350
2WESF:Westfit:Luneau0642563
3WTC:Winchester:Atkins06061275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Jennifer Girasole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.22
Juana Luneau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.20
Jaclyn Race
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Dianthe Doldo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Sandra Harrington
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jaclyn Race + Dianthe Doldo5263% games+15.9% vs expected
Jaclyn Race + Jennifer Girasole621962% games+9.3% vs expected
Juana Luneau + Sandra Harrington613056% games+2.6% vs expected
Jennifer Girasole + Dianthe Doldo3353% games+2.0% vs expected
Juana Luneau + Jaclyn Race224 matchesnot enough data
Juana Luneau + Dianthe Doldo314 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Harrington + Dianthe Doldo033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Girasole
139W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
Juana Luneau
220W–86L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
4.22
4.5
Jaclyn Race
153W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Dianthe Doldo
91W–63L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
4.14
Sandra Harrington
132W–80L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
4.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.