Teams

WTC:Winchester:Atkins

2026 EMA Tri Level Winter · Spring

4 players · average NTRP 4.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings3 teams · Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LFW:Longfellow:Cunnigham0651350
2WESF:Westfit:Luneau0642563
3WTC:Winchester:Atkins06061275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Julia Lefler
published
4.11
Alisa Atkins
published 4.5
4.04
Allison Vizgaitis
published 4.5
4.02
Rielly Malz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Lefler + Alisa Atkins4155% games+7.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Lefler
12W–8L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Alisa Atkins
174W–111L career · no lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
4.11
4.5
Allison Vizgaitis
60W–53L career · no lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
4.04
Rielly Malz
19W–14L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.