Teams

AK-TAC-Knapp

2024 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.79 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-11-30vs HelpersWon 30
W#1 DoublesTrena Rairdon / Catherine Stone vs Ann Brown / Jessie Lief6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlice Knapp / Stacia Green vs Nura Abdulhalim / Fledz Lastimoso6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaren Loeffler / Marlys Morton vs Denise Henderson / Janis Skliar6-1, 6-3
2023-11-29vs HelpersWon 21
W#1 DoublesCatherine Stone / Trena Rairdon vs Nura Abdulhalim / Jessie Lief6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Loeffler / Linda Westwick vs Ann Brown / Denise Henderson6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMarlys Morton / Stacia Green vs Fledz Lastimoso / Leilah Hemmen0-1
2023-11-27vs HelpersWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlice Knapp / Linda Westwick vs Ann Brown / Denise Henderson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKaren Loeffler / Marlys Morton vs Janis Skliar / Leilah Hemmen6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Catherine Stone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Linda Westwick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Trena Rairdon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Alice Knapp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Stacia Green
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Marlys Morton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Karen Loeffler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Stone + Trena Rairdon5171% games+9.7% vs expected
Catherine Stone + Stacia Green10169% games+3.8% vs expected
Alice Knapp + Marlys Morton1442% gamesnot enough data
Stacia Green + Marlys Morton1436% gamesnot enough data
Karen Loeffler + Linda Westwick314 matchesnot enough data
Alice Knapp + Karen Loeffler033 matchesnot enough data
Alice Knapp + Linda Westwick303 matchesnot enough data
Karen Loeffler + Marlys Morton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Stone
189W–51L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Linda Westwick
28W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Trena Rairdon
42W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Alice Knapp
46W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.64
3.5
Stacia Green
93W–65L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Marlys Morton
161W–112L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Karen Loeffler
68W–83L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.