Teams

BC-PVTC/BrianHaag

2022 MIXED 40 & OVER · BC - Mixed 40 & Over - 7.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-08-28vs BC-WestEnd/DeborahRaaschWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Haag / Rika Tanous vs Christie Edman / Mohammad Holil6-1, 6-4
2022-07-17vs BC-MCC/MikeYogiLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Haag / Rika Tanous vs Sonja Harrington / Michael Stillman0-6, 1-6
2022-06-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesRika Tanous / Michael Goldberg vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC - Mixed 40 & Over - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
3.35
David Stumfall
published 3.5
3.32
Gretchen Albarian
published 3.5
3.32
Rika Tanous
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Tricia Rapaport
published
3.29
Carrie Munsell
published 3.5
3.29
Patrick Pittenger
published
Brian Haag
published 3.5
JOE TALOSI
published 3.5
3.19
Janette Dawson
published
3.19
Anthony Choe
published 3.5
3.16
Janet Young
published
3.13
Linda Stone
published
3.11
Rex Claridge
published
3.09
Mark Blons
published
2.96
Elizabeth Lujambio
published 3.5
2.82
Philicia Endelman
published
2.78
Dale Hughes
published 3
Jenny Forsyth
published
Jude Vieira
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephanie Guggenheim
67W–59L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
3.5
David Stumfall
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Gretchen Albarian
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Rika Tanous
128W–103L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Tricia Rapaport
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Carrie Munsell
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Patrick Pittenger
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%1%99%
3.29
3.5
Brian Haag
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
JOE TALOSI
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Janette Dawson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Anthony Choe
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Janet Young
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Linda Stone
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Rex Claridge
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Mark Blons
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.09
3.5
Elizabeth Lujambio
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.96
Philicia Endelman
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Dale Hughes
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
Jenny Forsyth
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jude Vieira
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.