Teams

Koenigsberg (Dante Fascell)

2023 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Fall Day · 3.0 Adult Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.23 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Jessica Patino
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.54
3.36
Rhonda MacAu
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.35
Teresa Roades
published
3.24
Amy Tolman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.13
Marilda del Rey
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.90
Inmaculada Clariana
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.89
Maria Basterra
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.82
2.75
Sherien Elbahkeiry
published
2.73
Christian Chamizo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Rosana Weinstein Aronson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Ana Romero Nunez
published 3
2.66
Ana Fernandez
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Patino + Amy Tolman351258% games+15.4% vs expected
Ana Fernandez + Inmaculada Clariana423753% games+11.3% vs expected
Ana Fernandez + Marilda del Rey4646% games+6.2% vs expected
Rhonda MacAu + Maria Basterra8267% gamesnot enough data
Rhonda MacAu + Marilda del Rey6364% gamesnot enough data
Christian Chamizo + Maria Basterra3357% gamesnot enough data
Inmaculada Clariana + Marilda del Rey6064% gamesnot enough data
Christian Chamizo + Marilda del Rey224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jessica Patino
156W–64L career · 6 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Charlotte Marthinsson
22W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.54
Rhonda MacAu
113W–54L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Teresa Roades
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Amy Tolman
115W–45L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Marilda del Rey
153W–98L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Inmaculada Clariana
87W–81L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Maria Basterra
112W–142L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
Amy van Den Dijssel
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
2.82
Sherien Elbahkeiry
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Christian Chamizo
77W–87L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Rosana Weinstein Aronson
81W–56L career · 1 line in 2023
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Ana Romero Nunez
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Ana Fernandez
84W–82L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.