Teams

OC RCI - Sue - Sun11am

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over - OC WE · OC Women WE - 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#2 DoublesValentina Stepanova / Alyssia Lyon vs Quynh Nghiem / Nikki Lee6-1, 6-2
2023-02-26vs OC Los Cab - Naomi Sat11Won 10
W#1 DoublesMiho Mori / Risa Chung vs Janet Hirtler / Cheryl Hirtler6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPaula Nishibayashi / Alyssia Lyon vs Hye Jin Robertson / Megan Osborn4-6, 3-6
2023-02-12vs OC Fullerton TC - BarbiWon 20
W#1 DoublesMiho Mori / Risa Chung vs Lena Loha / Viviana Kim6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesValentina Stepanova / Luna Qingyue Cai vs Julie Napoli / Michelle Sanchez6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMai Gu / Paula Nishibayashi vs Mary DeVlugt / Michele Savoie6-2, 6-2
2023-01-22vs OC - Huntington Club - CherylWon 10
W#1 DoublesSue Littman / Paula Nishibayashi vs Laurette Jennings / Janna McConnell2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Valentina Stepanova
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Miho Mori
published
4.00
Risa Chung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Luna Qingyue Cai
published
3.84
Michelle Sinclair
published
3.76
Terri Hamm
published
3.70
Randi Reznik
published
3.58
Kelly Hogan
published
3.57
Paula Nishibayashi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Mai Gu
published
3.15
Elizabeth Frost
published 3.5
Kimberley Kausen
published
Sue Littman
published
Susie Hunnel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mai Gu + Michelle Sinclair3551% games−0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Valentina Stepanova
172W–73L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
4.22
Miho Mori
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
4.10
4
Risa Chung
157W–89L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
4.00
Luna Qingyue Cai
10W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.84
Michelle Sinclair
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.84
Terri Hamm
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
Randi Reznik
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Kelly Hogan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Paula Nishibayashi
92W–73L career · 3 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
Mai Gu
13W–16L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Elizabeth Frost
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.15
Kimberley Kausen
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sue Littman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susie Hunnel
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.