Teams

OC - Huntington Club - Cheryl

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over - OC WE · OC Women WE - 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-01vs OC Acing Gracefully - CMTC - TriciaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBarbara Wilson / Emalyn Anthony vs Cathy Jackson / Julie Hull6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesRosalinda Fazio vs Jenniffer Wong5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-03-26vs OC Los Cab - Naomi Sat11Won 10
W#2 DoublesTatyana Bukrinsky / Emalyn Anthony vs Kerry Wessel / Naomi Sugiura6-2, 6-3
2023-03-19vs OC 40 Love - LPC Diekneit Sun11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEmalyn Anthony / Janna McConnell vs Doreen Brinkman / Lisa Fahey2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesEmalyn Anthony vs Megan Osborn6-1, 6-2
2023-02-26vs OC LLW CMTC - DeeLost 01
L#3 DoublesRosalinda Fazio / Michelle Bachand vs Dee Harriman / Stacy Tzur6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-01-28vs OC Fullerton TC - BarbiWon 10
W#3 DoublesCheryl Gates / Sue Magnall vs Yolanda Barocio / Gladys Tan6-1, 6-1
2023-01-22vs OC RCI - Sue - Sun11amSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEmalyn Anthony vs Michelle Sinclair6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRosalinda Fazio / Michelle Bachand vs Mai Gu / Elizabeth Frost7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Emalyn Anthony
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
Christine Callas
published 4
3.64
Cheryl Gates
published 4
3.53
Sue Magnall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Rosalinda Fazio
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.37
Lisa Rhoads
published
3.33
Janna McConnell
published
3.22
Josephine Garrett
published
Mary Amen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Gates + Janna McConnell3548% games+9.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Emalyn Anthony
106W–57L career · 5 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
4.15
4
Christine Callas
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Cheryl Gates
16W–12L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Sue Magnall
33W–43L career · 1 line in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Rosalinda Fazio
96W–130L career · 3 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
Lisa Rhoads
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
Janna McConnell
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.33
Josephine Garrett
7W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%6%94%
3.22
Mary Amen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.