Teams

GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Pendergras/EPCC

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.86 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings10 teams · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Munoz/CCC81321334334
2GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Pendergras/EPCC72291641364
3GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Zaragoza/EPTC#363252052408
4GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Missirian/EPTC#154212452430
5GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Gonzalez/EPTC#654202555406
6GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Johnson/EPTC#545242147359
7GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Hufft/FB45242149371
8GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Tan/EPTC#736192656436
9GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Delgado/EPTC#227172863455
10GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Maese/EPTC#418133267469

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Ashleigh Barreno
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.71
Allison Deputy
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.67
Danielle Harrison
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Cindy Karam
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.56
Ashley Bowling
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published 4
3.31
Andrea McMillan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Anna Camille Kerr
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Elsie Villarreal
usually #2 Doubles 73%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
Genevieve Pendergras
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Jessica Porras
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Karla di Pascuale
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Kathy Cartwright
usually #3 Doubles 79%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Kelly Upson
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
Laura Leslie
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Megan Harris
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Melissa Isaac
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Tina Gute
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Traci Hooker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Cartwright + Ashley Bowling13265% games+6.8% vs expected
Tina Gute + Kelly Upson6648% games+4.9% vs expected
Danielle Harrison + Kathy Cartwright261557% games+1.5% vs expected
Genevieve Pendergras + Ashley Bowling6453% games−3.4% vs expected
Tina Gute + Genevieve Pendergras11458% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Cartwright + Anna Camille Kerr8254% gamesnot enough data
Laura Leslie + Elsie Villarreal5456% gamesnot enough data
Anna Camille Kerr + Elsie Villarreal8157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ashleigh Barreno
49W–30L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Allison Deputy
58W–34L career · 14 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Danielle Harrison
48W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Cindy Karam
36W–24L career · 13 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Ashley Bowling
59W–43L career · 17 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Andrea McMillan
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Anna Camille Kerr
42W–28L career · 18 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Elsie Villarreal
57W–39L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Genevieve Pendergras
68W–38L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jessica Porras
22W–8L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karla di Pascuale
70W–41L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Cartwright
98W–60L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kelly Upson
45W–40L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Leslie
48W–65L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Megan Harris
67W–10L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Isaac
107W–104L career · 29 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tina Gute
74W–62L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Traci Hooker
27W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.