Teams

MORAGA CC 40AW3.5A

2023 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
3.72
Ria Nickens
published
3.70
Lauren Fritch
published
3.66
Connie Koplan
published 4
3.48
Bryn Strong
published 3.5
3.40
Erin Ackdoe
published
3.35
Denise Acker
published 3.5
3.35
Jill Hudson
published
3.32
Stephanie Barmmer
published
3.22
Grace Kan
published
3.21
Kimberley Zembsch
published
3.18
Cheryl Cushing
published 3.5
3.18
Jo Mckinlay
published
3.12
Kimberly Hunter
published
3.00
Karin Hein
published
Lucy Sponsler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bryn Strong + Molly Harcos Tamariki4166% games+9.7% vs expected
Jill Hudson + Erin Ackdoe213 matchesnot enough data
Erin Ackdoe + Bryn Strong123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Harcos Tamariki
20W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%3%97%
3.77
Ria Nickens
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Lauren Fritch
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Connie Koplan
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
3.5
Bryn Strong
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%43%
3.48
Erin Ackdoe
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Denise Acker
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
Jill Hudson
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.35
Stephanie Barmmer
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Grace Kan
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Kimberley Zembsch
7W–20L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Cheryl Cushing
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Jo Mckinlay
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Kimberly Hunter
5W–19L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
Karin Hein
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
Lucy Sponsler
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.