Teams

WASHINGTON PK CW6.5A

2022 COMBO · Women 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-06vs RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK CW6.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulie Borjon / Sarah McElhinney vs Cindy Mark / Linda Low2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-10-30vs CROW CANYON CC CW6.5BLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Borjon / Tammi Hodsdon vs Tammy Fox / April Mundy2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-10-30vs RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK CW6.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Borjon / Jillianne Whitfield vs Megan AbramsonWard / Jasmine Morgan2-6, 4-6
2022-10-04vs PLEASANTON CW6.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Borjon / Grace Fan vs Shauntae Morris / Rosalynd Zahiri2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-09-30vs PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CW6.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Borjon / Jillianne Whitfield vs Mayra Dominguez / Clairessa Brown6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJulie Borjon / Angela Logan vs Malou Matthew / Florita Labrador6-1, 6-2
2022-08-29vs HARBOR BAY CW6.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Borjon / Anne Rainwater vs Isobel Gotto / Kaylee Chan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Janie McCauley
published
3.66
Belinda Buchanan
published 3.5
3.36
Julie Borjon
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.30
Susan Weeks
published
3.29
Prathiba Ramamurthy
published
3.27
Anne Rainwater
published 3.5
Alicia Martin
published 3.5
3.23
Sarah McElhinney
published
3.15
Renee Mercier
published
2.83
Serena Zanello
published
2.71
Lynne Harrington
published
2.67
Cora Luber
published 3
2.62
Laura Sumrall
published
SK Kerastas
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janie McCauley
18W–16L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Belinda Buchanan
8W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%11%89%
3.66
3.5
Julie Borjon
92W–55L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.36
Susan Weeks
25W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Prathiba Ramamurthy
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Anne Rainwater
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Alicia Martin
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah McElhinney
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Renee Mercier
13W–16L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Serena Zanello
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
2.83
Lynne Harrington
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Cora Luber
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
Laura Sumrall
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62
SK Kerastas
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.